Literature DB >> 21773995

Optimal monitoring time interval between DXA measures in children.

John A Shepherd1, Li Wang, Bo Fan, Vicente Gilsanz, Heide J Kalkwarf, Joan Lappe, Ying Lu, Thomas Hangartner, Babette S Zemel, Margaret Fredrick, Sharon Oberfield, Karen K Winer.   

Abstract

The monitoring time interval (MTI) is the expected time in years necessary to identify a change between two measures that exceeds the measurement error. Our purpose was to determine MTI values for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in normal healthy children, according to age, sex, and skeletal site. 2014 children were enrolled in the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study and had DXA scans of the lumbar spine, total hip, nondominant forearm, and whole body. Measurements were obtained annually for seven visits from 2002 to 2010. Annualized rates of change were calculated by age and sex for all bone regions. A subgroup of 155 children ages 6 to 16 years (85 boys) had duplicate scans for calculation of scan precision. The bone mineral density (BMD) regions of interest included the spine, total body less head (TBLH), total hip, femoral neck, and one-third radius. Bone mineral content (BMC) was also evaluated for the spine and TBLH. The percent coefficient of variation (%CV) and MTI were calculated for each measure as a function of age and sex. The MTI values were substantially less than 1 year for the TBLH and spine BMD and BMC for boys ≤ 17 years and girls ≤ 15 years. The hip and one-third radius MTIs were generally 1 year in the same group. MTI values as low as 3 months were found during the peak growth years. However, the MTI values in late adolescence for all regions were substantially longer and became nonsensical as each region neared the age for peak bone density. All four DXA measurement sites had reasonable (< 1 year) MTI values for boys ≤ 17 years and girls ≤ 15 years. MTI was neither useful nor stable in late adolescence and young adulthood. Alternative criteria to determine scan intervals must be used in this age range.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21773995      PMCID: PMC3200454          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  16 in total

1.  Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.

Authors:  S Kolta; P Ravaud; J Fechtenbaum; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Ying Lu; Kevin Wilson; Thomas Fuerst; Harry Genant; Thomas N Hangartner; Charles Wilson; Didier Hans; Edward S Leib
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 4.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.

Authors:  W W Koo; J Walters; A J Bush
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Revised reference curves for bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density according to age and sex for black and non-black children: results of the bone mineral density in childhood study.

Authors:  Babette S Zemel; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Vicente Gilsanz; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; John A Shepherd; Margaret M Frederick; Xiangke Huang; Ming Lu; Soroosh Mahboubi; Thomas Hangartner; Karen K Winer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications.

Authors:  V Gilsanz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.

Authors:  T N Hangartner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Accuracy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for body-composition measurements in children.

Authors:  K J Ellis; R J Shypailo; J A Pratt; W G Pond
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Reproducibility of pediatric whole body bone and body composition measures by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using the GE Lunar Prodigy.

Authors:  Lauren Margulies; Mary Horlick; John C Thornton; Jack Wang; Elli Ioannidou; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  State of the art systematic review of bone disease in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Madhusmita Misra; Neville H Golden; Debra K Katzman
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 2.  The Utility of DXA Assessment at the Forearm, Proximal Femur, and Lateral Distal Femur, and Vertebral Fracture Assessment in the Pediatric Population: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Monitoring time interval for pQCT-derived bone outcomes in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R L Duckham; A W Frank; J D Johnston; W P Olszynski; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry in pediatrics: a practical review and update.

Authors:  Hedieh Khalatbari; Larry A Binkovitz; Marguerite T Parisi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28

5.  Intermachine differences in DXA measurements vary by skeletal site, and impact the assessment of low bone density in children.

Authors:  Babette S Zemel; Halley Wasserman; Andrea Kelly; Bo Fan; John Shepherd; Joan Lappe; Vicente Gilsanz; Sharon Oberfield; Karen K Winer; Heidi J Kalkwarf
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Halley Wasserman; Jennifer M O'Donnell; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  Longitudinal tracking of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measures over 6 years in children and adolescents: persistence of low bone mass to maturity.

Authors:  Tishya A L Wren; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Babette S Zemel; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; John A Shepherd; Karen K Winer; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  The Efficacy of Low-intensity Vibration to Improve Bone Health in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease Is Highly Dependent on Compliance and Muscle Response.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Mary B Leonard; Elizabeth A Kobe; Michelle A Slinger; Kelly A Borges; Erica Billig; Clinton T Rubin; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Bone mineral content and density of the lumbar spine of infants and toddlers: influence of age, sex, race, growth, and human milk feeding.

Authors:  Heidi J Kalkwarf; Babette S Zemel; Kimberly Yolton; James E Heubi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.