Literature DB >> 9518226

Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications.

V Gilsanz1.   

Abstract

The recent development of methods for measuring bone mineral content in children has markedly improved our ability to determine changes in bone mass during growth. Currently, the three most generally accepted techniques for measuring the bones of children are dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS). These techniques vary considerably in their acquisition of data and comparisons between them are difficult and, more often than not, judgment regarding their value has been, at least partially, subjective. DXA is, by far, the most widely used technique for bone measurements. It is low in cost, accessible, easy to use, and provides an accurate and precise quantitation of bone mass in adults. Unfortunately, DXA is unable to account for the large changes in body and skeletal size that occur during growth, limiting its use in longitudinal studies in children. QCT can asses both the volume and the density of bone in the axial and appendicular skeletons, without influence from body or skeletal size, giving it a major advantage over other modalities for bone measurements in children. The cost and inaccessibility of CT scanners, however, has significantly limited its use for bone measurements. Measuring the bones of children by QUS is appealing because ultrasound is low in cost, portable, easy to use and does not emit radiation. In adults, this technique is able to predict fracture risk independent of bone mass determinations in patients with osteoporosis and, therefore, its measurements must be related to certain aspects of bone strength. However, ultrasound values are dependent on so many structural properties not yet fully understood, that it is difficult to use the information meaningfully in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9518226     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00093-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  38 in total

Review 1.  Bone outcomes and technical measurement issues of bone health among children and adolescents: considerations for nutrition and physical activity intervention trials.

Authors:  Jayne A Fulkerson; John H Himes; Simone A French; Sally Jensen; Moira A Petit; Christy Stewart; Mary Story; Kristine Ensrud; Sandy Fillhouer; Kristine Jacobsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Longitudinal changes in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures during childhood.

Authors:  M Lee; R W Nahhas; A C Choh; E W Demerath; D L Duren; W C Chumlea; R J Sherwood; B Towne; R M Siervogel; S A Czerwinski
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The correlation between calcaneus stiffness index calculated by QUS and total body BMD assessed by DXA in Chinese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Bin Guo; Jian Gong; Hao Xu; Zhiquan Bai
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Osteoporosis in children and young adults: a late effect after chemotherapy for bone sarcoma.

Authors:  Ulrike Michaela Pirker-Frühauf; Jörg Friesenbichler; Ernst-Christian Urban; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Bone measurements of infants in the first 3 months of life by quantitative ultrasound: the influence of gestational age, season, and postnatal age.

Authors:  Xiang-Peng Liao; Wei-Li Zhang; Jiamin He; Jian-Hua Sun; Ping Huang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-05-12

6.  Relationship between lean body mass and isokinetic peak torque of knee extensors and flexors in severely burned children.

Authors:  Christian Tapking; Andrew M Armenta; Daniel Popp; David N Herndon; Ludwik K Branski; Jong O Lee; Oscar E Suman
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 7.  Perspectives on osteoporosis in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Manisha Harpavat; David J Keljo
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

8.  A randomised controlled trial of standing programme on bone mineral density in non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  J M Caulton; K A Ward; C W Alsop; G Dunn; J E Adams; M Z Mughal
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Bone mass and structure in adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared to healthy peers.

Authors:  M T Saha; H Sievänen; M K Salo; S Tulokas; H H Saha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone mass and density in preadolescent boys with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  J Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.