Literature DB >> 32795677

Intermachine differences in DXA measurements vary by skeletal site, and impact the assessment of low bone density in children.

Babette S Zemel1, Halley Wasserman2, Andrea Kelly3, Bo Fan4, John Shepherd5, Joan Lappe6, Vicente Gilsanz7, Sharon Oberfield8, Karen K Winer9, Heidi J Kalkwarf10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone mineral content (BMC) and areal-bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements of the lumbar spine (LS) and whole body less head (WBLH) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are recommended for bone health assessment in children. Intermachine differences were not considered previously in formulating these recommendations.
METHODOLOGY: DXA measurements of the LS, WBLH, total hip, femoral neck and distal 1/3 radius from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study were examined. Healthy children, ages 6 to 16 years, from five clinical centers participated. The same spine, whole body, and femur phantoms were measured on each Center's DXA machine. Percentage of individuals with low BMC or aBMD (Z-score < -1.5) was determined. Clinical center differences were evaluated by analysis of covariance adjusting for height and BMI Z-score, calcium intake, physical activity, Tanner stage and bone age. Logistic regression assessed odds of low BMC or aBMD across clinical centers.
RESULTS: Significant differences among Clinical Centers (p < 0.05) were evident in adjusted mean BMC and aBMD Z-scores (n = 1503) for all skeletal sites. WBLH BMC and aBMD Z-scores had the greatest range across centers (-0.13 to 0.24, and -0.17 to 0.56, respectively). The percentage of children with Z-scores less than -1.5 varied among Clinical Centers from 1.9 [95%CI 0.8, 4.5] to 8.1 [95%CI 5.7, 11.3] for WBLH BMC, 1.1 [95%CI 0.4, 3.5] to 6.3 [95%CI 3.8, 10.1] for WBLH aBMD, and from 4.4 [95%CI 2.8, 7.0] to 12.6 [95%CI 9.3, 16.9] for distal 1/3 radius aBMD. For each skeletal site except total hip aBMD and femoral neck BMC, at least one center had significantly lower odds of low bone density.
CONCLUSIONS: By design, our reference ranges capture intermachine variability. Most clinical centers don't know where their machine falls within the range of intermachine variability, and this may affect diagnosis of children evaluated for conditions that threaten bone health. Total hip scans showed the least, and whole body scans showed the most intermachine variability. Pediatric bone health assessment recommendations should recognize intermachine differences and address this important issue.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density; Children; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Intermachine variability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32795677      PMCID: PMC7680379          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  22 in total

1.  Effect of random BMD measurement errors on diagnostic classification using T-scores.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; John A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Effect of vitamin D replacement on musculoskeletal parameters in school children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Mona Nabulsi; Hala Tamim; Joyce Maalouf; Mariana Salamoun; Hassan Khalife; Mahmoud Choucair; Asma Arabi; Reinhold Vieth
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Cross-calibration, Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  Lawrence G Jankowski; Sarah Warner; Ken Gaither; Leon Lenchik; Bo Fan; Ying Lu; John Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls.

Authors:  K J Mackelvie; H A McKay; K M Khan; P R Crocker
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT.

Authors:  W A Kalender; D Felsenberg; H K Genant; M Fischer; J Dequeker; J Reeve
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  European cystic fibrosis bone mineralisation guidelines.

Authors:  Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Maria Luisa Bianchi; Michèle Garabédian; Robert M Aris; Alison Morton; Dana S Hardin; Sarah L Elkin; Juliet E Compston; Steven P Conway; Mireille Castanet; Susan Wolfe; Charles S Haworth
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  CDC growth charts: United States.

Authors:  R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2000-06-08

8.  Bone mineral density, growth, pubertal development and other parameters in Brazilian children and young adults with sickle cell anaemia.

Authors:  M Meeuwes; T F Souza de Carvalho; R Cipolotti; R Q Gurgel; T O Ferrão; M Peters; C Agyemang
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  A Contemporary View of the Definition and Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Leanne M Ward; David R Weber; Craig F Munns; Wolfgang Högler; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; John A Shepherd; John P Bilezikian; Sanford Baim
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  2 in total

1.  The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae.

Authors:  Enisa Shevroja; François Mo Costabella; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Didier Hans
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.879

2.  An update on methods for assessing bone quality and health in Cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Kristen M Williams; Amy Darukhanavala; Rebecca Hicks; Andrea Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.