Literature DB >> 21769144

Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education.

David W Stewart1, Stacy D Brown, Cheri W Clavier, Jarrett Wyatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the type and extent of active-learning techniques used in US colleges and schools of pharmacy as well as factors associated with use of these techniques.
METHODS: A survey instrument was developed to assess whether and to what extent active learning was used by faculty members of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. This survey instrument was distributed via the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) mailing list.
RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (114) of all US colleges and schools of pharmacy were represented with at least 1 survey among the 1179 responses received. Eighty-seven percent of respondents used active-learning techniques in their classroom activities. The heavier the teaching workload the more active-learning strategies were used. Other factors correlated with higher use of active-learning strategies included younger faculty member age (inverse relationship), lower faculty member rank (inverse relationship), and departments that focused on practice, clinical and social, behavioral, and/or administrative sciences.
CONCLUSIONS: Active learning has been embraced by pharmacy educators and is used to some extent by the majority of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Future research should focus on how active-learning methods can be used most effectively within pharmacy education, how it can gain even broader acceptance throughout the academy, and how the effect of active learning on programmatic outcomes can be better documented.

Keywords:  active learning; pharmacy education; survey; teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769144      PMCID: PMC3138343          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  21 in total

1.  A quantitative assessment of a medicinal chemistry problem-based learning sequence.

Authors:  Andrew A Webster; Robert M Riggs
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B Price Kerfoot; William C DeWolf; Barbara A Masser; Paul A Church; Daniel D Federman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Price Kerfoot; Michael C Kearney; Donna Connelly; Michael L Ritchey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Expanding voluntary active-learning opportunities for pharmacy students in a Respiratory Physiology Module.

Authors:  Hardy Ernst; Kay Colthorpe
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Patrick J Medina; Donald S Wanzer; Jane E Wilson; Nelson Er; Mark L Britton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Rules of engagement-12 tips for successful use of "clickers" in the classroom.

Authors:  Kalyani Premkumar; Cyril Coupal
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues.

Authors:  M A Albanese; S Mitchell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Human patient simulation in a pharmacotherapy course.

Authors:  Amy L Seybert; Lawrence R Kobulinsky; Teresa P McKaveney
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

View more
  51 in total

1.  An objective structured clinical examination to assess problem-based learning.

Authors:  Francine D Salinitri; Mary Beth O'Connell; Candice L Garwood; Victoria Tutag Lehr; Karina Abdallah
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Concurrent use of an audience response system at a multi-campus college of pharmacy.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Fadi M Alkhateeb; Devada Singh-Franco
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A multi-instructor, team-based, active-learning exercise to integrate basic and clinical sciences content.

Authors:  Srikanth Kolluru; Darren M Roesch; Ayesha Akhtar de la Fuente
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  An Empirical Study of Neural Network-Based Audience Response Technology in a Human Anatomy Course for Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Laura López-González; Ofelia González-Sequeros; Chrisina Jayne; Juan José López-Jiménez; Juan Manuel Carrillo-de-Gea; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  An elective course on application of clinical pharmacy principles.

Authors:  Jessica H Brady; David J Caldwell; Kristen A Pate; Adam N Pate
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Student preferences regarding teaching methods in a drug-induced diseases and clinical toxicology course.

Authors:  Anastasia Rivkin; Suzanna Gim
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  A workshop on smoking cessation for pharmacy students.

Authors:  Maya Saba; Renee Bittoun; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Correlation between active-learning coursework and student retention of core content during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Kristy H Lucas; Julie A Testman; Marcella N Hoyland; Angel M Kimble; Mary L Euler
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 9.  Educational Games as a Teaching Tool in Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Mona Hassan Aburahma; Heba Moustafa Mohamed
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Outcomes of Individualized Formative Assessments in a Pharmacy Skills Laboratory.

Authors:  Tyler Harris Gums; Erika L Kleppinger; Benjamin Y Urick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.