Literature DB >> 26056404

Outcomes of Individualized Formative Assessments in a Pharmacy Skills Laboratory.

Tyler Harris Gums1, Erika L Kleppinger2, Benjamin Y Urick1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an individualized teaching method in a pharmacy skills laboratory.
DESIGN: All third-year students enrolled in an Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) accredited doctor of pharmacy program (n=150) received an individual formative assessment from clinical pharmacists on communication skills and clinical competency after the students counseled standardized mock glaucoma patients during a laboratory focused on alternative dosing formulations. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores for this station from the 2012 and 2013 classes were compared before and after the intervention. ASSESSMENT: Ophthalmic OSCE station scores were higher after the individual formative feedback intervention. Students in 2013 had a mean score of 83.2 ± 8.3% compared to a mean of 74.3 ± 12.9% in 2012 for this OSCE station. The percentage of students receiving an "A" on the OSCE station increased from 8.1% to 31.3% after the intervention.
CONCLUSION: Individualized formative teaching methods benefited students in both their communication skills and clinical assessment. Future research should focus on wider implementation and overcoming obstacles, such as increased facilitator needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pharmacy Education; Skills Laboratory; Teaching Methods

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26056404      PMCID: PMC4453082          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe789166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  5 in total

1.  Objective structured clinical examinations in doctor of pharmacy programs in the United States.

Authors:  Deborah A Sturpe
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A standardized patient counseling rubric for a pharmaceutical care and communications course.

Authors:  Niambi Horton; Kenna D Payne; Michelle Jernigan; Jill Frost; Stephen Wise; Mary Klein; Joel Epps; H Glenn Anderson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Simulated medication therapy management activities in a pharmacotherapy laboratory course.

Authors:  Casey E Gallimore; Joshua M Thorpe; Kari Trapskin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education.

Authors:  David W Stewart; Stacy D Brown; Cheri W Clavier; Jarrett Wyatt
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) compared with traditional assessment methods.

Authors:  Stewart Brian Kirton; Laura Kravitz
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Getting Rigor Right.

Authors:  Tyler M Rose
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nelson; Rebecca B Carlson; Amanda H Corbett; Dennis M Williams; Denise H Rhoney
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Use of End-of-Class Quizzes to Promote Pharmacy Student Self-Reflection, Motivate Students to Improve Study Habits, and to Improve Performance on Summative Examinations.

Authors:  Ruth Vinall; Eugene Kreys
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.