OBJECTIVES: To introduce a multiple-instructor, team-based, active-learning exercise to promote the integration of basic sciences (pathophysiology, pharmacology, and medicinal chemistry) and clinical sciences in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. DESIGN: A team-based learning activity that involved pre-class reading assignments, individual-and team-answered multiple-choice questions, and evaluation and discussion of a clinical case, was designed, implemented, and moderated by 3 faculty members from the pharmaceutical sciences and pharmacy practice departments. ASSESSMENT: Student performance was assessed using a multiple-choice examination, an individual readiness assurance test (IRAT), a team readiness assurance test (TRAT), and a subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) note. Student attitudes were assessed using a pre- and post-exercise survey instrument. Students' understanding of possible correct treatment strategies for depression improved. Students were appreciative of this true integration of basic sciences knowledge in a pharmacotherapy course and to have faculty members from both disciplines present to answer questions. Mean student score on the on depression module for the examination was 80.4%, indicating mastery of the content. CONCLUSIONS: An exercise led by multiple instructors improved student perceptions of the importance of team-based teaching. Integrated teaching and learning may be achieved when instructors from multiple disciplines work together in the classroom using proven team-based, active-learning exercises.
OBJECTIVES: To introduce a multiple-instructor, team-based, active-learning exercise to promote the integration of basic sciences (pathophysiology, pharmacology, and medicinal chemistry) and clinical sciences in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. DESIGN: A team-based learning activity that involved pre-class reading assignments, individual-and team-answered multiple-choice questions, and evaluation and discussion of a clinical case, was designed, implemented, and moderated by 3 faculty members from the pharmaceutical sciences and pharmacy practice departments. ASSESSMENT: Student performance was assessed using a multiple-choice examination, an individual readiness assurance test (IRAT), a team readiness assurance test (TRAT), and a subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) note. Student attitudes were assessed using a pre- and post-exercise survey instrument. Students' understanding of possible correct treatment strategies for depression improved. Students were appreciative of this true integration of basic sciences knowledge in a pharmacotherapy course and to have faculty members from both disciplines present to answer questions. Mean student score on the on depression module for the examination was 80.4%, indicating mastery of the content. CONCLUSIONS: An exercise led by multiple instructors improved student perceptions of the importance of team-based teaching. Integrated teaching and learning may be achieved when instructors from multiple disciplines work together in the classroom using proven team-based, active-learning exercises.
Entities:
Keywords:
active learning; depression; pharmacotherapy; team teaching; team-based learning
Authors: Nancy A Letassy; Susan E Fugate; Melissa S Medina; Jeffrey S Stroup; Mark L Britton Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Stuart J Beatty; Katherine A Kelley; Anne H Metzger; Katherine L Bellebaum; James W McAuley Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Michelle Z Farland; Brigitte L Sicat; Andrea S Franks; Karen S Pater; Melissa S Medina; Adam M Persky Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Barry E Bleske; Tami L Remington; Trisha D Wells; Kristin C Klein; Sally K Guthrie; Jeffrey M Tingen; Vincent D Marshall; Michael P Dorsch Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2016-09-25 Impact factor: 2.047