Literature DB >> 23966726

Student preferences regarding teaching methods in a drug-induced diseases and clinical toxicology course.

Anastasia Rivkin1, Suzanna Gim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine which teaching method in a drug-induced diseases and clinical toxicology course was preferred by students and whether their preference correlated with their learning of drug-induced diseases.
DESIGN: Three teaching methods incorporating active-learning exercises were implemented. A survey instrument was developed to analyze students' perceptions of the active-learning methods used and how they compared to the traditional teaching method (lecture). Examination performance was then correlated to students' perceptions of various teaching methods. ASSESSMENT: The majority of the 107 students who responded to the survey found traditional lecture significantly more helpful than active-learning methods (p=0.01 for all comparisons). None of the 3 active-learning methods were preferred over the others. No significant correlations were found between students' survey responses and examination performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Students preferred traditional lecture to other instructional methods. Learning was not influenced by the teaching method or by preference for a teaching method.

Keywords:  active learning; drug-induced diseases; instructional methods

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966726      PMCID: PMC3748304          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe776123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  6 in total

Review 1.  An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes.

Authors:  Brenda L Gleason; Michael J Peeters; Beth H Resman-Targoff; Samantha Karr; Sarah McBane; Kristi Kelley; Tyan Thomas; Tina H Denetclaw
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Evaluating student perceptions of a learner-centered drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Spencer E Harpe; Lisa B Phipps
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education.

Authors:  David W Stewart; Stacy D Brown; Cheri W Clavier; Jarrett Wyatt
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Incorporating active-learning techniques and competency assessment into a critical care elective course.

Authors:  Daniel R Malcom; Jennifer L Hibbs
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Active-learning assignments to integrate basic science and clinical course material.

Authors:  Leisa L Marshall; Diane Nykamp
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Active-learning implementation in an advanced elective course on infectious diseases.

Authors:  Levita Hidayat; Shreya Patel; Keith Veltri
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.047

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  A Novel Teaching Tool Combined With Active-Learning to Teach Antimicrobial Spectrum Activity.

Authors:  Conan MacDougall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Active learning should not be one-size-fits-all for foundation knowledge courses.

Authors:  Inder Sehgal
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Improving medical student recruitment into neurosurgery through teaching reform.

Authors:  Jun Shen; Lili Yuan; Ruixiang Ge; Xuefei Shao; Xiaochun Jiang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.263

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.