Literature DB >> 21560010

Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance.

Dawn M McBride1, Jaclyn K Beckner, Drew H Abney.   

Abstract

To address the mixed results reported in previous studies, the present experiments examined forgetting in prospective memory (PM) by manipulating the delay between the PM instructions and cue presentation in event-based PM tasks. PM performance was measured for delays of 2-20 min in Experiment 1 and for delays of approximately 1-10 min in Experiment 2. Experiment 2 included both focal and nonfocal PM tasks, and speed on the ongoing task was measured to examine evidence for monitoring processes across the delays tested. The results suggest that nonfocal PM performance follows a nonlinear forgetting function (i.e., rapid decline for shorter delays and slower decline for longer delays) when tested over delays from 1 to 20 min. No effect of delay was seen for the focal task tested in Experiment 2 from 1 to 10 min. In Experiment 2, ongoing-task costs were also found for the first delay but not for longer delays, suggesting that monitoring was significantly reduced between 1 and 2.5 min of the ongoing-task trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21560010     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0105-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity.

Authors:  G O Einstein; L J Holland; M A McDaniel; M J Guynn
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-09

3.  Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007).

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

5.  Retrieval experience in prospective memory: strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Beat Meier; Thomas D Zimmermann; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-10

6.  The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; R Reed Hunt; Jennifer C McVay; Melissa D McConnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  An investigation into the resource requirements of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Gillian Yeo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

8.  Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebecca Kearney; Roger Remington
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

9.  Normal aging and prospective memory.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  What Costs Do Reveal and Moving Beyond the Cost Debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (in press).

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Franziska Plessow; Thomas Goschke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-07

2.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory.

Authors:  C Dennis Boywitt; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

3.  Retrieval cue and delay interval influence the relationship between prospective memory and activities of daily living in older adults.

Authors:  Savanna M Tierney; Romola S Bucks; Michael Weinborn; Erica Hodgson; Steven Paul Woods
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Thought probes during prospective memory encoding: Evidence for perfunctory processes.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Michelle N Dasse; Ji Hae Lee; Courtney A Kurinec; Claudina Tami; Madison L Krueger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prior experience with target encounter affects attention allocation and prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Kara N Moore; James Michael Lampinen; Eryn J Adams; Blake L Nesmith; Presley Burch
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.