Literature DB >> 23864265

Rapid volitional control of apparent motion during percept generation.

Julia A Mossbridge1, Laura Ortega, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

How rapidly can one voluntarily influence percept generation? The time course of voluntary visual-spatial attention is well studied, but the time course of intentional control over percept generation is relatively unknown. We investigated the latter question using "one-shot" apparent motion. When a vertical or horizontal pair of squares is replaced by its 90º-rotated version, the bottom-up signal is ambiguous. From this ambiguous signal, it is known that people can intentionally generate a percept of rotation in a desired direction (clockwise or counterclockwise). To determine the time course of this intentional control, we instructed participants to voluntarily induce rotation in a precued direction (clockwise rotation when a high-pitched tone was heard, and counterclockwise rotation when a low-pitched tone was heard), and then to report the direction of rotation that was actually perceived. We varied the delay between the instructional cue and the rotated frame (cue-lead time) from 0 to 1,067 ms. Intentional control became more effective with longer cue-lead times (asymptotically effective at 533 ms). Notably, intentional control was reliable even with a zero cue-lead time; control experiments ruled out response bias and the development of an auditory-visual association as explanations. This demonstrates that people can interpret an auditory cue and intentionally generate a desired motion percept surprisingly rapidly, entirely within the subjectively instantaneous moment in which the visual system constructs a percept of apparent motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864265      PMCID: PMC3800212          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0504-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  31 in total

1.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Treisman; B J Gibbs
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Direction selective neurons respond to short-range and long-range apparent motion stimuli in macaque visual area MT.

Authors:  A Mikami
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.292

5.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

6.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; S A Hillyard; S J Luck; M Mouloua; C J Downing; D P Woodward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities.

Authors:  M L Cheal; D Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1989-11

8.  Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  W T Newsome; R H Wurtz; M R Dürsteler; A Mikami
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Attention and apparent motion.

Authors:  T Horowitz; A Treisman
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1994

10.  Velocity constraints on apparent rotational movement.

Authors:  J E Farrell; A Larsen; C Bundesen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  2 in total

1.  Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities?

Authors:  Allison K Allen; Matthew T Jacobs; Nicolas Davidenko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  When perception is stronger than physics: Perceptual similarities rather than laws of physics govern the perception of interacting objects.

Authors:  Alexander Pastukhov; Lisa Koßmann; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.