Literature DB >> 31435748

Reaching for the high note: judgments of auditory pitch are affected by kinesthetic position.

Autumn B Hostetter1, Christina M Dandar2, Gabrielle Shimko2, Colin Grogan2.   

Abstract

Auditory pitch is represented on a vertical continuum (e.g., high vs. low). In three experiments, we examined whether the kinesthetic experience of moving in a particular direction (e.g., walking up vs. down stairs; reaching up vs. down) would affect judgments of auditory pitch. Participants listened to three tones twice each, once while moving upward and once while moving downward, and estimated the pitch of each tone. In all experiments, participants' judgments of the tones' pitch were biased in the direction of their movement. Moreover, this effect is not due to visibility of the movement or to using a numerical response method. Our results suggest that kinesthetic information from one's own bodily movements biases pitch estimation, and several possible mechanisms for the effect are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory pitch; Cross-modal priming; Kinesthetic information

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31435748     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00929-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  21 in total

Review 1.  Six views of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Ryota Kanai; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

4.  Eyebrow movements and vocal pitch height: evidence consistent with an ethological signal.

Authors:  David Huron; Daniel Shanahan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Changes in auditory frequency guide visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-07-08

7.  Do you see what I'm singing? Visuospatial movement biases pitch perception.

Authors:  Louise Connell; Zhenguang G Cai; Judith Holler
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Drawing sounds: representing tones and chords spatially.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Montejo; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Jorge A Alvarado; Juan Camilo Arboleda; Daniel R Suarez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne Treisman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Does Language Influence the Vertical Representation of Auditory Pitch and Loudness?

Authors:  Irune Fernandez-Prieto; Charles Spence; Ferran Pons; Jordi Navarra
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.