Literature DB >> 26541054

Direction of Auditory Pitch-Change Influences Visual Search for Slope From Graphs.

Stacey Parrott, Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez, Laura Orte, Marcia Grabowecky, Mark D Huntington, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

Linear trend (slope) is important information conveyed by graphs. We investigated how sounds influenced slope detection in a visual search paradigm. Four bar graphs or scatter plots were presented on each trial. Participants looked for a positive-slope or a negative-slope target (in blocked trials), and responded to targets in a go or no-go fashion. For example, in a positive-slope-target block, the target graph displayed a positive slope while other graphs displayed negative slopes (a go trial), or all graphs displayed negative slopes (a no-go trial). When an ascending or descending sound was presented concurrently, ascending sounds slowed detection of negative-slope targets whereas descending sounds slowed detection of positive-slope targets. The sounds had no effect when they immediately preceded the visual search displays, suggesting that the results were due to crossmodal interaction rather than priming. The sounds also had no effect when targets were words describing slopes, such as "positive," "negative," "increasing," or "decreasing," suggesting that the results were unlikely due to semantic-level interactions. Manipulations of spatiotemporal similarity between sounds and graphs had little effect. These results suggest that ascending and descending sounds influence visual search for slope based on a general association between the direction of auditory pitch-change and visual linear trend.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26541054      PMCID: PMC4638167          DOI: 10.1177/0301006615596904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  18 in total

Review 1.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Ryota Kanai; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

4.  Cross-modal equivalence of visual and auditory scatterplots for exploring bivariate data samples.

Authors:  J H Flowers; D C Buhman; K D Turnage
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The effects of culture, environment, age, and musical training on choices of visual metaphors for sound.

Authors:  R Walker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

9.  Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Multisensory integration: space, time and superadditivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  2 in total

1.  Coarse to Fine Audio-Visual Size Correspondences Develop During Primary School Age.

Authors:  Luigi F Cuturi; Alessia Tonelli; Giulia Cappagli; Monica Gori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12

2.  Impact of ambient sound on risk perception in humans: neuroeconomic investigations.

Authors:  Elise Payzan-LeNestour; Lionnel Pradier; James Doran; Gideon Nave; Bernard Balleine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.