Literature DB >> 21717445

Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance.

Marc D Schwartz1, Claudine Isaacs, Kristi D Graves, Elizabeth Poggi, Beth N Peshkin, Christy Gell, Clinton Finch, Scott Kelly, Kathryn L Taylor, Lauren Perley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing to benefit public health, mutation carriers must initiate appropriate risk management strategies. There has been little research examining the long-term use and prospective predictors of the full range of risk management behaviors among women who have undergone BRCA1/2 testing. We evaluated long-term uptake and predictors of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO), chemoprevention, and cancer screening among women at a mean of 5.3 years after testing.
METHODS: The study participants comprised 465 women who underwent BRCA1/2 testing. Prior to genetic counseling, we measured family/personal cancer history, sociodemographics, perceived risk, cancer-specific distress, and general distress. We contacted patients at a mean of 5.3 years after testing to measure use of RRM, RRBSO, chemoprevention, and breast and ovarian cancer screening.
RESULTS: Among participants with intact breasts and/or ovaries at the time of testing, BRCA1/2 carriers were significantly more likely to obtain RRM (37%) and RRBSO (65%) compared with women who received uninformative (RRM, 6.8%; RRBSO, 13.3%) or negative (RRM, 0%; RRBSO, 1.9%) results. Among carriers, precounseling anxiety was associated with subsequent uptake of RRM. RRO was predicted by age. Carriers were also more likely have used breast cancer chemoprevention and have undergone magnetic resonance imaging screening.
CONCLUSION: This prospective evaluation of the uptake and predictors of long-term management outcomes provides a clearer picture of decision making in this population. At a mean of 5.3 years after testing, more than 80% of carriers had obtained RRM, RRBSO, or both, suggesting that BRCA1/2 testing is likely to have a favorable effect on breast and ovarian cancer outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717445      PMCID: PMC3286617          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

1.  Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita H Halbert; Tiffani A DeMarco; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Risk-reducing surgery, screening and chemoprevention practices of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  K-A Phillips; M A Jenkins; G J Lindeman; S A McLachlan; J M McKinley; P C Weideman; J L Hopper; M L Friedlander
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Elizabeth B Habermann; Erin H Grund; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Randomized trial of a decision aid for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: impact on measures of decision making and satisfaction.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; William Lawrence; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Claudine Isaacs; Suzanne O'Neill; Rebecca Shelby; Sherry C Grumet; Margaret M McGovern; Sarah Garnett; Heather Bremer; Suzanne Leaman; Kathryn O'Mara; Sarah Kelleher; Kathryn Komaridis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Jan Lubinski; Parviz Ghadirian; Henry Lynch; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Eitan Friedman; William D Foulkes; Susan Domchek; Peter Ainsworth; Claudine Isaacs; Nadine Tung; Jacek Gronwald; Shelly Cummings; Teresa Wagner; Siranoush Manoukian; Pål Møller; Jeffrey Weitzel; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in a prospective cohort of unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Tara M Friebel; Susan M Domchek; Susan L Neuhausen; Theresa Wagner; D Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Mary B Daly; Rosalind Eeles; Ellen Matloff; Gail Tomlinson; Henry T Lynch; Nadine Tung; Joanne L Blum; Jeffrey Weitzel; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Fergus Couch; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Mark E Robson; Johanna Lee; Judy E Garber; Claudine Isaacs; D Gareth Evans; Henry Lynch; Rosalind A Eeles; Susan L Neuhausen; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Joanne L Blum; Paul Sabbatini; Richard R Barakat; Clifford Hudis; Larry Norton; Kenneth Offit; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Uptake and timing of bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Comfort N Ibe; James J Dignam; Shelly A Cummings; Marion Verp; Melody A White; Grazia Artioli; Laura Dudlicek; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 in a UK clinical cohort: three-year follow-up.

Authors:  C Foster; M Watson; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; R Davidson; J Mackay; P J Morrison; P Hopwood; D G R Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  59 in total

1.  Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chalanda N Evans; Noel T Brewer; Susan T Vadaparampil; Marc Boisvert; Yvonne Ottaviano; M Catherine Lee; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anne Weidner; Courtney Lewis; Devon Bonner; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The Role of Knowledge on Genetic Counseling and Testing in Black Cancer Survivors at Increased Risk of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation.

Authors:  Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Monica C Jackson; Lyndsay Anderson; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 7.  Impact of genetic risk assessment on nutrition-related lifestyle behaviours.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Vernarelli
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.297

8.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing.

Authors:  Gabriel N Mannis; Julia E Fehniger; Jennifer S Creasman; Vanessa L Jacoby; Mary S Beattie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Women's concerns about the emotional impact of awareness of heritable breast cancer risk and its implications for their children.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Darren Mays; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Judy E Garber; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-08-07

10.  Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations in an urban population of Black women.

Authors:  Filipa Lynce; Karen Lisa Smith; Julie Stein; Tiffani DeMarco; Yiru Wang; Hongkun Wang; Melissa Fries; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.