Literature DB >> 18268356

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study.

Noah D Kauff1, Susan M Domchek, Tara M Friebel, Mark E Robson, Johanna Lee, Judy E Garber, Claudine Isaacs, D Gareth Evans, Henry Lynch, Rosalind A Eeles, Susan L Neuhausen, Mary B Daly, Ellen Matloff, Joanne L Blum, Paul Sabbatini, Richard R Barakat, Clifford Hudis, Larry Norton, Kenneth Offit, Timothy R Rebbeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has been widely adopted as a key component of breast and gynecologic cancer risk-reduction for women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Despite 17% to 39% of all BRCA mutation carriers having a mutation in BRCA2, no prospective study to date has evaluated the efficacy of RRSO for the prevention of breast and BRCA-associated gynecologic (ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal) cancer when BRCA2 mutation carriers are analyzed separately from BRCA1 mutation carriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,079 women 30 years of age and older with ovaries in situ and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were enrolled onto prospective follow-up studies at one of 11 centers from November 1, 1994 to December 1, 2004. Women self-selected RRSO or observation. Follow-up information through November 30, 2005, was collected by questionnaire and medical record review. The effect of RRSO on time to diagnosis of breast or BRCA-associated gynecologic cancer was analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards model.
RESULTS: During 3-year follow-up, RRSO was associated with an 85% reduction in BRCA1-associated gynecologic cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.56) and a 72% reduction in BRCA2-associated breast cancer risk (HR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.92). While protection against BRCA1-associated breast cancer (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.22) and BRCA2-associated gynecologic cancer (HR = 0.00; 95% CI, not estimable) was suggested, neither effect reached statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: The protection conferred by RRSO against breast and gynecologic cancers may differ between carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of risk-reduction strategies in BRCA mutation carriers should stratify by the specific gene mutated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18268356      PMCID: PMC3306809          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  M C King; S Wieand; K Hale; M Lee; T Walsh; K Owens; J Tait; L Ford; B K Dunn; J Costantino; L Wickerham; N Wolmark; B Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J Boyd; Y Sonoda; M G Federici; F Bogomolniy; E Rhei; D L Maresco; P E Saigo; L A Almadrones; R R Barakat; C L Brown; D S Chi; J P Curtin; E A Poynor; W J Hoskins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  I Hedenfalk; D Duggan; Y Chen; M Radmacher; M Bittner; R Simon; P Meltzer; B Gusterson; M Esteller; O P Kallioniemi; B Wilfond; A Borg; J Trent; M Raffeld; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; E Dougherty; J Kononen; L Bubendorf; W Fehrle; S Pittaluga; S Gruvberger; N Loman; O Johannsson; H Olsson; G Sauter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Sunil R Lakhani; Marc J Van De Vijver; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Thomas J Anderson; Peter P Osin; Lesley McGuffog; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group.

Authors:  S A Narod; J S Brunet; P Ghadirian; M Robson; K Heimdal; S L Neuhausen; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; C Lerman; B Pasini; P de los Rios; B Weber; H Lynch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lauren Scheuer; Noah Kauff; Mark Robson; Bridget Kelly; Richard Barakat; Jaya Satagopan; Nathan Ellis; Martee Hensley; Jeff Boyd; Patrick Borgen; Larry Norton; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Nananda Col; Eric P Winer; Deborah E Collyar; Steven R Cummings; Victor G Vogel; Harold J Burstein; Andrea Eisen; Isaac Lipkus; David G Pfister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Richard R Barakat
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  172 in total

Review 1.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts.

Authors:  Alfons Meindl; Nina Ditsch; Karin Kast; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita K Schmutzler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Genetics for the general internist.

Authors:  Christina M Laukaitis
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Soley Bayraktar; Angelica M Gutierrez-Barrera; Diane Liu; Tunc Tasbas; Ugur Akar; Jennifer K Litton; E Lin; Constance T Albarracin; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  [Guideline for the prevention and early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in high risk patients, particularly in women from HBOC (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) families].

Authors:  Christian F Singer; Muy-Kheng Tea; Gunda Pristauz; Michael Hubalek; Christine Rappaport; Christopher Riedl; Thomas Helbich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers.

Authors:  Victor R Grann; Priya R Patel; Judith S Jacobson; Ellen Warner; Daniel F Heitjan; Maxine Ashby-Thompson; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  BRCA1/2 population screening: embracing the benefits.

Authors:  S E Plon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  RE: Breast Cancer Risk After Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Healthy BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: Revisiting the Evidence for Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Xinglei Chai; Susan Domchek; Noah Kauff; Timothy Rebbeck; Jinbo Chen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Response.

Authors:  B A M Heemskerk-Gerritsen; M J Hooning; M A Rookus
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

10.  Acceptability of prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as risk-reducing surgery among BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Laura L Holman; Sue Friedman; Molly S Daniels; Charlotte C Sun; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.