Literature DB >> 28182268

Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.

Deborah Cragun1,2, Anne Weidner1, Courtney Lewis1, Devon Bonner1, Jongphil Kim1, Susan T Vadaparampil1, Tuya Pal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) disparities may widen with genomic advances. The authors compared non-Hispanic white (NHW), black, and Hispanic BC survivors for 1) cancer risk-management practices among BRCA carriers and 2) provider discussion and receipt of genetic testing.
METHODS: A population-based sample of NHW, black, and Hispanic women who had been diagnosed with invasive BC at age 50 years or younger from 2009 to 2012 were recruited through the state cancer registry. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare cancer risk-management practices in BRCA carriers and associations of demographic and clinical variables with provider discussion and receipt of testing.
RESULTS: Of 1622 participants, 159 of 440 (36.1%) black women, 579 of 897 (64.5%) NHW women, 58 of 117 (49.6%) Spanish-speaking Hispanic women, and 116 of 168 (69%) English-speaking Hispanic women underwent BRCA testing, of whom 90 had a pathogenic BRCA mutation identified. Among BRCA carriers, the rates of risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy were significantly lower among black women compared with Hispanic and NHW women after controlling for clinical and demographic variables (P = .025 and P = .008, respectively). Compared with NHW women, discussion of genetic testing with a provider was 16 times less likely among black women (P < .0001) and nearly 2 times less likely among Spanish-speaking Hispanic women (P = .04) after controlling for clinical and sociodemographic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that the rates of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy are lower among black BRCA carriers compared with their Hispanic and NHW counterparts, which is concerning because benefits from genetic testing arise from cancer risk-management practice options. Furthermore, lower BRCA testing rates among blacks may partially be because of a lower likelihood of provider discussion. Future studies are needed to improve cancer risk identification and management practices across all populations to prevent the widening of disparities. Cancer 2017;123:2497-05.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; cancer disparities; cancer risk management genetic testing; hereditary cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28182268      PMCID: PMC5474124          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  48 in total

1.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Young Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia F Borges; Bryce Larsen; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 2.  Prevention and management of hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Health Care Segregation, Physician Recommendation, and Racial Disparities in BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Susan M Domchek; Peter W Groeneveld; Younji Kim; U Nkiru Motanya; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: new beliefs shape new generation.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Tiffany Edwards; Cristina Villagra; M Carina Rodriguez; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA 1/2 testing among United States physicians: a vignette-based study.

Authors:  Katrina F Trivers; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Jacqueline W Miller; Barbara Matthews; C Holly A Andrilla; Denise M Lishner; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Awareness and preferences regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing among Latinas and non-Latina white women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Dawn Gammon; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Lori Ballinger; Deirdre A Hill; Kenneth M Boucher; Anita Yeomans Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Are physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast cancer appropriate? A population-based study.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Tracey Fredricks; Lache Wilkins; Irene Roelfsema; Kaijun Liao; Judy A Shea; Peter Groeneveld; Susan M Domchek; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Use of Cancer Genetics Services in African-American Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Tarsha Jones; Joan S Lockhart; Kari E Mendelsohn-Victor; Debra Duquette; Laurel L Northouse; Sonia A Duffy; Rosemary Donley; Sofia D Merajver; Kara J Milliron; J Scott Roberts; Maria C Katapodi
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  70 in total

1.  Breast cancer in young black women.

Authors:  S M Walsh; E C Zabor; J Flynn; M Stempel; M Morrow; M L Gemignani
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Diversity in the Era of Precision Medicine - From Bench to Bedside Implementation.

Authors:  Abdullah Mamun; Nana Y Nsiah; Meenakshi Srinivasan; Ayyappa Chaturvedula; Riyaz Basha; Deanna Cross; Harlan P Jones; Karabi Nandy; Jamboor K Vishwanatha
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 3.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christina D Williams; Alyssa Jasmine Bullard; Meghan O'Leary; Reana Thomas; Thomas S Redding; Karen Goldstein
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Persistent Underutilization of BRCA1/2 Testing Suggest the Need for New Approaches to Genetic Testing Delivery.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Charles Muller; Sang Mee Lee; William Barge; Shazia M Siddique; Shivali Berera; Gina Wideroff; Rashmi Tondon; Jeremy Chang; Meaghan Peterson; Jessica Stoll; Bryson W Katona; Daniel A Sussman; Joshua Melson; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Does race predict survival for women with invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Siún M Walsh; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Baseline knowledge and receptiveness to genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes in Chinese high-risk females.

Authors:  Annie Tsz-Wai Chu; Desiree Man-Sik Tse; Dacita To Ki Suen; Ava Kwong
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Association of Racial/Ethnic Categories With the Ability of Genetic Tests to Detect a Cause of Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Latrice G Landry; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Kelli Nam; Courtney L Scherr; Jongphil Kim; Ram Thapa; Cathy D Meade; M Catherine Lee; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.