Literature DB >> 27059031

Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Chalanda N Evans1, Noel T Brewer2, Susan T Vadaparampil3, Marc Boisvert4, Yvonne Ottaviano5, M Catherine Lee3, Claudine Isaacs1, Marc D Schwartz1, Suzanne C O'Neill6.   

Abstract

Practice guidelines incorporate genomic tumor profiling, using results such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), to refine recurrence risk estimates for the large proportion of breast cancer patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive disease. We sought to understand the impact of receiving genomic recurrence risk estimates on breast cancer patients' well-being and the impact of these patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants were 193 women (mean age 57) newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Women were interviewed before and 2-3 weeks after receiving the RS result between 2011 and 2015. We assessed subsequent receipt of chemotherapy from chart review. After receiving their RS, perceived pros (t = 4.27, P < .001) and cons (t = 8.54, P < .001) of chemotherapy increased from pre-test to post-test, while perceived risk of breast cancer recurrence decreased (t = 2.90, P = .004). Women with high RS tumors were more likely to receive chemotherapy than women with low RS tumors (88 vs. 5 %, OR 0.01, 0.00-0.02, P < .001). Higher distress (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.05-4.57, P < .05) and lower perceived cons of chemotherapy (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.26-0.97, P < .05) also predicted receipt of chemotherapy. Distressed patients who saw few downsides of chemotherapy received this treatment. Clinicians should consider these factors when discussing chemotherapy with breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  21-Gene; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Treatment decisions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059031      PMCID: PMC5065914          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3780-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  34 in total

1.  Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Influence of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Chemotherapy Delivery in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Charles E Rutter; Xiaopan Yao; Brandon R Mancini; Jenerius A Aminawung; Anees B Chagpar; Ozlen Saglam; Erin W Hofstatter; Maysa Abu-Khalaf; Cary P Gross; Suzanne B Evans
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Adoption of Gene Expression Profiling for Breast Cancer in US Oncology Practice for Women Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Calvin Chao; Huei-Ting Tsai; Chunfu Liu; Bola F Ekezue; Nandini Selvam; Larry G Kessler; Marc D Schwartz; Tania Lobo; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Initial Trends in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Patients With Breast Cancer in the Medicare Population, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Xiaojuan Mi; Shelby D Reed; Bradford R Hirsch; Gary H Lyman; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: what makes AC and CMF worthwhile now?

Authors:  V M Duric; M R Stockler; S Heritier; F Boyle; J Beith; A Sullivan; N Wilcken; A S Coates; R J Simes
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Adherence to mammography and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-80 years of age the role of psychological distress.

Authors:  Suzy O'Donnell; Bram Goldstein; M Robin Dimatteo; Sarah A Fox; Cameron R John; John E Obrzut
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010-09

Review 7.  Psychological and social aspects of breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection.

Authors:  Shelly S Lo; Patricia B Mumby; John Norton; Karen Rychlik; Jeffrey Smerage; Joseph Kash; Helen K Chew; Ellen R Gaynor; Daniel F Hayes; Andrew Epstein; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Treatment decisions in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer patients with intermediate oncotype DX recurrence score results.

Authors:  Georgeta Fried; Mor Moskovitz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-02-06

10.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; E P Winer; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multilevel Influences on Patient-Oncologist Communication about Genomic Test Results: Oncologist Perspectives.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kathryn L Taylor; Jonathan Clapp; Jinani Jayasekera; Claudine Isaacs; Deena Mary Atieh Graham; Stuart L Goldberg; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-08-21

2.  Benefits of introduction of Oncotype DX® testing.

Authors:  N Green; A Al-Allak; C Fowler
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Receptivity toward Genomic Testing and Targeted Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs to Prevent Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Denalee M O'Malley; Cindy K Blair; Alissa Greenbaum; Charles L Wiggins; Ashwani Rajput; Vi K Chiu; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-08

4.  Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Susan T Vadaparampil; Susan Eggly; Richard L Street; Tanina Foster Moore; Claudine Isaacs; Hyo S Han; Bianca Augusto; Jennifer Garcia; Katherine Lopez; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-28

5.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.