Literature DB >> 23095764

Impact of genetic risk assessment on nutrition-related lifestyle behaviours.

Jacqueline A Vernarelli1.   

Abstract

Genetic susceptibility testing for common complex disease is a practice that is currently in clinical use. There are two types of gene mutations, and therefore, two varieties of genotype testing: deterministic and susceptibility. As the term suggests, deterministic genes determine whether or not a person will develop a given trait in mendelian fashion, such as Huntington's disease. Genotype screening for such deterministic mutations has existed for decades, and is commonly used in routine medical practice. In recent years, the sequencing of the human genome has identified several 'susceptibility genes' or genes with incomplete penetrance. Mutations in these genes may increase disease susceptibility, but are not causative for disease. Genetic susceptibility testing allows unaffected individuals to obtain risk information for a variety of common complex diseases and health conditions including Alzheimer's disease (AD), CVD, cancer and diabetes. The availability of genetic susceptibility testing has increased over the past decade, and several studies are now focusing on the impact that genetic testing has on health and other lifestyle behaviours related to nutrition. The aim of this paper is to review the literature and evaluate what, if any, impact genetic risk assessment has on behaviours related to nutrition and physical activity. This paper summarises seven clinical studies that evaluated the impact of disclosing genetic risk information for disease on nutrition-related health behaviour changes. Of these seven studies, only three studies reported that health behaviour change was influenced by genotype disclosure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23095764      PMCID: PMC3756543          DOI: 10.1017/S0029665112002741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  40 in total

1.  Medical food and food supplements: not always as safe as generally assumed.

Authors:  Stephan Reichenbach; Peter Jüni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Motivating the unmotivated for health behavior change: a randomized trial of cessation induction for smokers.

Authors:  Matthew J Carpenter; Anthony J Alberg; Kevin M Gray; Michael E Saladin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Does genetic testing result in behavioral health change? Changes in smoking behavior following testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

Authors:  Matthew J Carpenter; Charlie Strange; Yonge Jones; Marguerite R Dickson; Cindy Carter; M Allison Moseley; Gregory E Gilbert
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2007-02

Review 4.  Prevention of breast cancer in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Ronit Calderon-Margalit; Ora Paltiel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Serena Chao; J Scott Roberts; Theresa M Marteau; Rebecca Silliman; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

7.  Colorectal cancer cases and relatives of cases indicate similar willingness to receive and disclose genetic information.

Authors:  Rachel M Ceballos; Polly A Newcomb; Jeannette M Beasley; Scot Peterson; Allyson Templeton; Julie R Hunt
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-09

8.  Perceived impact of diabetes genetic risk testing among patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sarah M Markowitz; Elyse R Park; Linda M Delahanty; Kelsey E O'Brien; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  FTO gene polymorphisms and obesity risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sihua Peng; Yimin Zhu; Fangying Xu; Xiaobin Ren; Xiaobo Li; Maode Lai
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Genome-wide association scan shows genetic variants in the FTO gene are associated with obesity-related traits.

Authors:  Angelo Scuteri; Serena Sanna; Wei-Min Chen; Manuela Uda; Giuseppe Albai; James Strait; Samer Najjar; Ramaiah Nagaraja; Marco Orrú; Gianluca Usala; Mariano Dei; Sandra Lai; Andrea Maschio; Fabio Busonero; Antonella Mulas; Georg B Ehret; Ashley A Fink; Alan B Weder; Richard S Cooper; Pilar Galan; Aravinda Chakravarti; David Schlessinger; Antonio Cao; Edward Lakatta; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  6 in total

1.  Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.

Authors:  T Hurlimann; V Menuz; J Graham; J Robitaille; M-C Vohl; B Godard
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  Does personal genome testing drive service utilization in an adult preventive medicine clinic?

Authors:  Ny Hoang; Robin Hayeems; Jill Davies; Shuye Pu; Syed Wasim; Lea Velsher; James Aw; Sébastien Chénier; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Riyana Babul-Hirji; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Shuman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-04-03

3.  The Alzheimer's Prevention Clinic at Weill Cornell Medical College / New York - Presbyterian Hospital: Risk Stratification and Personalized Early Intervention.

Authors:  A Seifan; R Isaacson
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 4.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  The effect of communicating the genetic risk of cardiometabolic disorders on motivation and actual engagement in preventative lifestyle modification and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Sherly X Li; Zheng Ye; Kevin Whelan; Helen Truby
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Are People Ready for Personalized Brain Health? Perspectives of Research Participants in the Lifebrain Consortium.

Authors:  Barbara Bodorkos Friedman; Sana Suri; Cristina Solé-Padullés; Sandra Düzel; Christian A Drevon; William F C Baaré; David Bartrés-Faz; Anders M Fjell; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Kathrine S Madsen; Lars Nyberg; Brenda W J H Penninx; Claire Sexton; Kristine B Walhovd; Enikő Zsoldos; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-08-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.