BACKGROUND: Ectopic fat deposition in the pancreas and its association with hepatic steatosis have not previously been examined in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). AIM: To quantify pancreatic fat using a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique and determine whether it is associated with hepatic steatosis and/or fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including 43 adult patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD who underwent clinical evaluation, biochemical testing and MRI. The liver biopsy assessment was performed using the NASH-CRN histological scoring system, and liver and pancreas fat quantification was performed using a novel, validated MRI biomarker; the proton density fat fraction. RESULTS: The average MRI-determined pancreatic fat in patients with NAFLD was 8.5% and did not vary significantly between head, body, and tail of the pancreas. MRI-determined pancreatic fat content increased significantly with increasing histology-determined hepatic steatosis grade; 4.6% in grade 1; 7.7% in grade 2; 13.0% in grade 3 (P = 0.004) respectively. Pancreatic fat content was lower in patients with histology-determined liver fibrosis than in those without fibrosis (11.2% in stage 0 fibrosis vs. 5.8% in stage 1-2 fibrosis, and 6.9% in stage 3-4 fibrosis, P = 0.013). Pancreatic fat did not correlate with age, body mass index or diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NAFLD, increased pancreatic fat is associated with hepatic steatosis. However, liver fibrosis is inversely associated with pancreatic fat content. Further studies are needed to determine underlying mechanisms to understand if pancreatic steatosis affects progression of NAFLD.
BACKGROUND: Ectopic fat deposition in the pancreas and its association with hepatic steatosis have not previously been examined in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). AIM: To quantify pancreatic fat using a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique and determine whether it is associated with hepatic steatosis and/or fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including 43 adult patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD who underwent clinical evaluation, biochemical testing and MRI. The liver biopsy assessment was performed using the NASH-CRN histological scoring system, and liver and pancreas fat quantification was performed using a novel, validated MRI biomarker; the proton density fat fraction. RESULTS: The average MRI-determined pancreatic fat in patients with NAFLD was 8.5% and did not vary significantly between head, body, and tail of the pancreas. MRI-determined pancreatic fat content increased significantly with increasing histology-determined hepatic steatosis grade; 4.6% in grade 1; 7.7% in grade 2; 13.0% in grade 3 (P = 0.004) respectively. Pancreatic fat content was lower in patients with histology-determined liver fibrosis than in those without fibrosis (11.2% in stage 0 fibrosis vs. 5.8% in stage 1-2 fibrosis, and 6.9% in stage 3-4 fibrosis, P = 0.013). Pancreatic fat did not correlate with age, body mass index or diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NAFLD, increased pancreatic fat is associated with hepatic steatosis. However, liver fibrosis is inversely associated with pancreatic fat content. Further studies are needed to determine underlying mechanisms to understand if pancreatic steatosis affects progression of NAFLD.
Authors: Erwin-Jan M van Geenen; Mark M Smits; Tim C M A Schreuder; Donald L van der Peet; Elisabeth Bloemena; Chris J J Mulder Journal: Pancreas Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Alyssa D Chavez; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Daniel Nanz; Caecilia S Reiner; Matteo Montani; Stefan Breitenstein; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Paul Stolzmann; Borut Marincek; Hans Scheffel Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Geraldine H Kang; Irene Cruite; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jun Seok Lee; Sang Heum Kim; Dae Won Jun; Jee Hye Han; Eun Chul Jang; Ji Young Park; Byung Kwan Son; Seong Hwan Kim; Yoon Ju Jo; Young Sook Park; Yong Soo Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Abhishek Mathur; Henry A Pitt; Megan Marine; Romil Saxena; C Max Schmidt; Thomas J Howard; Attila Nakeeb; Nicholas J Zyromski; Keith D Lillemoe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Cyrielle Caussy; Veeral H Ajmera; Puneet Puri; Cynthia Li-Shin Hsu; Shirin Bassirian; Mania Mgdsyan; Seema Singh; Claire Faulkner; Mark A Valasek; Emily Rizo; Lisa Richards; David A Brenner; Claude B Sirlin; Arun J Sanyal; Rohit Loomba Journal: Gut Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Manoj Kumar Sarma; Andres Saucedo; Christine Hema Darwin; Ely Richard Felker; Kavya Umachandran; Daniel Kohanghadosh; Edward Xu; Steve Raman; Michael Albert Thomas Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-07-12 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Top Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-12
Authors: Paul Begovatz; Chrysi Koliaki; Katharina Weber; Klaus Strassburger; Bettina Nowotny; Peter Nowotny; Karsten Müssig; Jürgen Bunke; Giovanni Pacini; Julia Szendrödi; Michael Roden Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Lucia Pacifico; Michele Di Martino; Caterina Anania; Gian Marco Andreoli; Mario Bezzi; Carlo Catalano; Claudio Chiesa Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 5.742