PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to test the relative performance of chemical shift-based water-fat imaging in measuring bone marrow fat fraction in the presence of trabecular bone, having as reference standard the single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS: Six-echo gradient echo imaging and single-voxel MRS measurements were performed on the proximal femur of seven healthy volunteers. The bone marrow fat spectrum was characterized based on the magnitude of measurable fat peaks and an a priori knowledge of the chemical structure of triglycerides, in order to accurately extract the water peak from the overlapping broad fat peaks in MRS. The imaging-based fat fraction results were then compared to the MRS-based results both without and with taking into consideration the presence of short T2* water components in MRS. RESULTS: There was a significant underestimation of the fat fraction using the MRS model not accounting for short T2* species with respect to the imaging-based fat fraction. A good equivalency was observed between the fat fraction using the MRS model accounting for short T2* species and the imaging-based fat fraction (R(2) = 0.87). CONCLUSION: The consideration of the short T2* water species effect on bone marrow fat quantification is essential when comparing MRS-based and imaging-based fat fraction results.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to test the relative performance of chemical shift-based water-fat imaging in measuring bone marrow fat fraction in the presence of trabecular bone, having as reference standard the single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS: Six-echo gradient echo imaging and single-voxel MRS measurements were performed on the proximal femur of seven healthy volunteers. The bone marrow fat spectrum was characterized based on the magnitude of measurable fat peaks and an a priori knowledge of the chemical structure of triglycerides, in order to accurately extract the water peak from the overlapping broad fat peaks in MRS. The imaging-based fat fraction results were then compared to the MRS-based results both without and with taking into consideration the presence of short T2* water components in MRS. RESULTS: There was a significant underestimation of the fat fraction using the MRS model not accounting for short T2* species with respect to the imaging-based fat fraction. A good equivalency was observed between the fat fraction using the MRS model accounting for short T2* species and the imaging-based fat fraction (R(2) = 0.87). CONCLUSION: The consideration of the short T2* water species effect on bone marrow fat quantification is essential when comparing MRS-based and imaging-based fat fraction results.
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Alyssa D Chavez; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Xiaojuan Li; Daniel Kuo; Anne L Schafer; Anne Porzig; Thomas M Link; Dennis Black; Ann V Schwartz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: James F Griffith; David K W Yeung; Gregory E Antonio; Francis K H Lee; Athena W L Hong; Samuel Y S Wong; Edith M C Lau; Ping Chung Leung Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Catherine D G Hines; Charles A McKenzie; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Michael Meier-Schroers; Daniel Lloyd Kuetting; Andreas Feißt; Jürgen Gieseke; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: X Ojanen; R J H Borra; M Havu; S M Cheng; R Parkkola; P Nuutila; M Alen; S Cheng Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Andreas Feißt; Christoph Hans-Jürgen Endler; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.315