Literature DB >> 27579856

Chemical Shift magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging.

Weiguo Li1, Xifu Wang1, Frank H Miller1, Andrew C Larson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to develop a chemical shift magnetization transfer (CSMT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to provide accurate magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) measurements in the presence of fat.
METHODS: Numerical simulations were performed to compare MTR measurements at different echo times (TEs) for voxels with varying fat/water content. The CSMT approach was developed using water fraction estimates to correct for the impact of fat signal upon observed MTR measurements. The CSMT method was validated with oil/agarose phantom and animal studies.
RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that the observed MTRs vary with water fraction as well as with the TE-dependent phase difference between fat and water signals; simulations also showed that a linear relationship exists between MTR and water fraction when fat and water signals are in phase. For phantom studies, observed MTR decreased with increasing oil fraction: 42.41 ± 0.54, 38.12 ± 0.33, 32.93 ± 0.56, and 26.08 ± 0.87 for 5% to 40% oil fractions, respectively, compared to 42.63 ± 1.04 for phantom containing 4% agarose only. These offsets were readily corrected with the additional acquisition of a water fraction map.
CONCLUSION: Fat fraction and TE can significantly impact observed MTR measurements. The new CSMT approach offers the potential to eliminate the effects of fat upon MTR measurements. Magn Reson Med 78:656-663, 2017.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical shift; fat; fat water separation; magnetization transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27579856      PMCID: PMC5332527          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  34 in total

1.  Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Liu; Charles A McKenzie; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Fast fat suppression RF pulse train with insensitivity to B1 inhomogeneity for body imaging.

Authors:  Takayuki Abe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Simultaneous fat saturation and magnetization transfer contrast imaging with steady-state incoherent sequences.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Scott D Swanson; Jeffrey A Fessler; Douglas C Noll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  1H NMR chemical shift selective (CHESS) imaging.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; W Hänicke; D Matthaei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Addressing phase errors in fat-water imaging using a mixed magnitude/complex fitting method.

Authors:  D Hernando; C D G Hines; H Yu; S B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Evaluation of liver diseases via MTC and contrast agent.

Authors:  J H Chen; H N Yeung; S K Lee; J W Chai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Magnetization transfer helps detect intestinal fibrosis in an animal model of Crohn disease.

Authors:  Jeremy Adler; Scott D Swanson; Phyllissa Schmiedlin-Ren; Peter D R Higgins; Christopher P Golembeski; Alexandros D Polydorides; Barbara J McKenna; Hero K Hussain; Trevor M Verrot; Ellen M Zimmermann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  S D Wolff; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Joint estimation of water/fat images and field inhomogeneity map.

Authors:  D Hernando; J P Haldar; B P Sutton; J Ma; P Kellman; Z-P Liang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Magnetization transfer contrast imaging reveals amyloid pathology in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice.

Authors:  Christian Bigot; Greetje Vanhoutte; Marleen Verhoye; Annemie Van der Linden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Magnetization Transfer Ratio of Peripheral Nerve and Skeletal Muscle : Correlation with Demographic Variables in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Olivia Fösleitner; Véronique Schwehr; Tim Godel; Fabian Preisner; Philipp Bäumer; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Moritz Kronlage
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  Prediction of small for size syndrome after extended hepatectomy: Tissue characterization by relaxometry, diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetization transfer.

Authors:  Christian Eberhardt; Moritz C Wurnig; Andrea Wirsching; Cristina Rossi; Idana Feldmane; Mickael Lesurtel; Andreas Boss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Combining inhomogeneous magnetization transfer and multipoint Dixon acquisition: Potential utility and evaluation.

Authors:  Ece Ercan; Gopal Varma; Ivan E Dimitrov; Yin Xi; Marco C Pinho; Fang F Yu; Shu Zhang; Xinzeng Wang; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Robert E Lenkinski; David C Alsop; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.668

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.