Literature DB >> 14990831

MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.

Cedric M J de Bazelaire1, Guillaume D Duhamel, Neil M Rofsky, David C Alsop.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure T1 and T2 relaxation times of normal human abdominal and pelvic tissues and lumbar vertebral bone marrow at 3.0 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relaxation time was measured in six healthy volunteers with an inversion-recovery method and different inversion times and a multiple spin-echo (SE) technique with different echo times to measure T1 and T2, respectively. Six images were acquired during one breath hold with a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot fast SE sequence. Signal intensities in regions of interest were fit to theoretical curves. Measurements were performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Relaxation times at 1.5 T were compared with those reported in the literature by using a one-sample t test. Differences in mean relaxation time between 1.5 and 3.0 T were analyzed with a two-sample paired t test.
RESULTS: Relaxation times (mean +/- SD) at 3.0 T are reported for kidney cortex (T1, 1,142 msec +/- 154; T2, 76 msec +/- 7), kidney medulla (T1, 1,545 msec +/- 142; T2, 81 msec +/- 8), liver (T1, 809 msec +/- 71; T2, 34 msec +/- 4), spleen (T1, 1,328 msec +/- 31; T2, 61 msec +/- 9), pancreas (T1, 725 msec +/- 71; T2, 43 msec +/- 7), paravertebral muscle (T1, 898 msec +/- 33; T2, 29 msec +/- 4), bone marrow in L4 vertebra (T1, 586 msec +/- 73; T2, 49 msec +/- 4), subcutaneous fat (T1, 382 msec +/- 13; T2, 68 msec +/- 4), prostate (T1, 1,597 msec +/- 42; T2, 74 msec +/- 9), myometrium (T1, 1,514 msec +/- 156; T2, 79 msec +/- 10), endometrium (T1, 1,453 msec +/- 123; T2, 59 msec +/- 1), and cervix (T1, 1,616 msec +/- 61; T2, 83 msec +/- 7). On average, T1 relaxation times were 21% longer (P <.05) for kidney cortex, liver, and spleen and T2 relaxation times were 8% shorter (P <.05) for liver, spleen, and fat at 3.0 T; however, the fractional change in T1 and T2 relaxation times varied greatly with the organ. At 1.5 T, no significant differences (P >.05) in T1 relaxation time between the results of this study and the results of other studies for liver, kidney, spleen, and muscle tissue were found.
CONCLUSION: T1 relaxation times are generally higher and T2 relaxation times are generally lower at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T, but the magnitude of change varies greatly in different tissues. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990831     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  225 in total

1.  Relaxivity of Ferumoxytol at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Gesine Knobloch; Timothy Colgan; Curtis N Wiens; Xiaoke Wang; Tilman Schubert; Diego Hernando; Samir D Sharma; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Renal blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging: contribution of R2 to R2* values.

Authors:  Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Pippa Storey; Hersh Chandarana; Akira Yamamoto; Kristopher Tantillo; Umer Khan; Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; James S Babb; Michael Bubenheim; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  MRI characterization of cobalt dichloride-N-acetyl cysteine (C4) contrast agent marker for prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tze Yee Lim; R Jason Stafford; Rajat J Kudchadker; Madhuri Sankaranarayanapillai; Geoffrey Ibbott; Arvind Rao; Karen S Martirosyan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Cedric de Bazelaire; Neil M Rofsky; Guillaume Duhamel; Jingbo Zhang; M Dror Michaelson; Daniel George; David C Alsop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Renal Adiposity Confounds Quantitative Assessment of Markers of Renal Diffusion With MRI: A Proposed Correction Method.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; Ahmed Saad; Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Hui Tang; John R Woollard; James F Glockner; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Increasing spatial resolution of 3T MRI scanning improves reproducibility of carotid arterial wall dimension measurements.

Authors:  Diederik F van Wijk; Aart C Strang; Raphael Duivenvoorden; Dirk-Jan F Enklaar; Rob J van der Geest; John J P Kastelein; Eric de Groot; Erik S G Stroes; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Measurement of liver fat fraction and iron with MRI and MR spectroscopy techniques.

Authors:  Puneet Sharma; Maria Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Bobby Kalb; Diego R Martin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Comparison of twice refocused spin echo versus stimulated echo diffusion tensor imaging for tracking muscle fibers.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Anders Andersen; Thorsten Feiweier; Bruce Damon; Peter Hardy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  A novel anthropomorphic flow phantom for the quantitative evaluation of prostate DCE-MRI acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Silvin P Knight; Jacinta E Browne; James F Meaney; David S Smith; Andrew J Fagan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Effect of apolipoprotein-B synthesis inhibition on liver triglyceride content in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Maartje E Visser; Fatima Akdim; Diane L Tribble; Aart J Nederveen; T Jesse Kwoh; John J P Kastelein; Mieke D Trip; Erik S G Stroes
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.922

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.