Literature DB >> 2171014

Segmented turboFLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast.

R R Edelman1, B Wallner, A Singer, D J Atkinson, S Saini.   

Abstract

A method called segmented turboFLASH imaging allows high-resolution, multisection, short-inversion-time (TI) inversion-recovery (STIR), T1- or T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) studies of the liver to be completed within a breath-hold interval. The method was applied in a phantom and in 19 patients with hepatic lesions. Sequence comparisons were performed among segmented turboFLASH, single-shot turboFLASH, T1-weighted gradient-echo with ultrashort echo time, and T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) techniques. Signal from fat and liver could be nulled with the segmented turboFLASH method, with TIs of 10 and 300 msec, respectively; signal from these tissues could not be eliminated with the single-shot approach. Signal-difference-to-noise ratios and contrast for the best segmented sequences were comparable with those of the best T2-weighted SE and T1-weighted gradient-echo techniques. It is concluded that it is feasible to obtain breath-hold images with arbitrary tissue contrast by means of segmented turboFLASH imaging. The method may prove helpful for the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions and will likely have applications to other anatomic regions such as the chest and pelvis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2171014     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2171014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Fast spin-echo imaging of the abdomen during breath-holding: an alternative to RASE and other fast imaging techniques.

Authors:  R C Nelson; J L Chezmar
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

2.  T2-weighted breathold imaging of the liver: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of fast spin echo and half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging.

Authors:  T K Helmberger; J Schröder; N Holzknecht; M Gregor; A Heuck; R Petsch; M F Reiser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Breathhold imaging of the upper abdomen using a circular polarized-array coil: comparison with standard body coil imaging.

Authors:  J Gauger; N G Holzknecht; C A Lackerbauer; H Sittek; K E Fiedler; R Petsch; M Reiser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Towards clinical assessment of velopharyngeal closure using MRI: evaluation of real-time MRI sequences at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  A D Scott; R Boubertakh; M J Birch; M E Miquel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  3D magnetization-prepared imaging using a stack-of-rings trajectory.

Authors:  Holden H Wu; Dwight G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI and Ischemic Heart Disease: Role in Diagnosis and Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Rahul N Sawlani; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Whole-brain three-dimensional T2-weighted BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Jun Hua; Qin Qin; Peter C M van Zijl; James J Pekar; Craig K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  J G Bogaert; H T Bosmans; F E Rademakers; E P Bellon; M C Herregods; J A Verschakelen; F Van de Werf; G J Marchal
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D J Pennell; H G Bogren; J Keegan; D N Firmin; S R Underwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  J Gaa; H Fischer; G Laub; M Georgi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.