Literature DB >> 10555172

T2-weighted breathold imaging of the liver: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of fast spin echo and half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging.

T K Helmberger1, J Schröder, N Holzknecht, M Gregor, A Heuck, R Petsch, M F Reiser.   

Abstract

The imaging characteristics of two EPI-hybrid breath-hold sequences, T2-weighted fast spin-echo [FSE, effective echo time (TEeff) 138 ms] and half Fourier single shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE, TEeff 60 ms), were compared in hepatic imaging. A total of 111 patients with suspected hepatic disease were studied at 1.5 Tesla using a body phase-array coil. The signal-to-noise (S/N) and contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios for organs and lesions were calculated and quantitatively compared. Organ delineation, visualization of anatomical structures and pathological lesions, artifacts, and total image quality were qualitatively assessed and statistically compared. The final diagnoses were metastases from colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancer in 23/111, hepatocellular carcinoma in 15/111, cysts in 19/111, hemangiomas in 9/111, several other lesions in 7/111, and no lesions in 38/111 of the cases. A total of 139 lesion in 73% of the patients were seen while 85% of the lesions were at least 1.5 cm in size. Regarding S/Ns HASTE was significantly (P < 0.03) superior to FSE with only minor (P > 0.05) differences in C/Ns between the two sequences for anatomical and pathological structures. HASTE demonstrated in almost all (97.3%) of the cases no artifacts, while on fast SE imaging moderate to minor artifacts were present in 23.5-51.7% of the cases. The overall image quality and diagnostic confidence was rated significantly higher (good 43.2%, excellent 53.2%) for HASTE than for fast SE imaging (good 44.8%, excellent 17.6%). Providing comparable C/Ns for anatomical and pathological structures, breatheld HASTE imaging proved to be superior to fast SE in T2-weighted imaging of the upper abdomen regarding general image quality, and, with adequate technical prerequisites, may be a suitable substitute of fast T2-imaging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555172     DOI: 10.1007/bf02634591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of single-breath-hold fast spin-echo sequences with routine non-breath-hold techniques: application to MRI of renal masses.

Authors:  P S Melki; C Argaud; M Suminski; O Hélénon; X Belin; P Millet; Y Chrétien; G Zannoli; J F Moreau
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold fast spin-echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression.

Authors:  P Soyer; S Le Normand; S C de Givry; C Gueye; E Somveille; A Scherrer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Ultrafast T2-weighted imaging of the abdomen and pelvis: use of single shot fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Y Tang; Y Yamashita; M Takahashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison of fast and conventional half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath-hold turbo spin-echo, and respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequences.

Authors:  Y Tang; Y Yamashita; T Namimoto; Y Abe; M Takahashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  T2-weighted MR imaging of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of various RARE and fat-suppressed spin-echo sequences.

Authors:  R C Semelka; J P Shoenut; R M Kroeker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A new T2 preparation technique for ultrafast gradient-echo sequence.

Authors:  T Parrish; X Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Motion artifacts in fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  B Madore; R M Henkelman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Echoplanar MR imaging of the liver in patients with focal hepatic lesions: quantitative analysis of images made with various pulse sequences.

Authors:  S Saini; P Reimer; P F Hahn; M S Cohen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation.

Authors:  N G Campeau; C D Johnson; J P Felmlee; J N Rydberg; R K Butts; R L Ehman; S J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.

Authors:  W S Whitney; R J Herfkens; R B Jeffrey; C H McDonnell; K C Li; W J Van Dalsem; R N Low; I R Francis; J F Dabatin; G M Glazer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.