Literature DB >> 8972320

Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrasound techniques.

J Gaa1, H Fischer, G Laub, M Georgi.   

Abstract

The performance of breath-hold MR imaging using two T2-weighted hybrid sequences (TSE, TGSE), two T2-weighted single-shot sequences (HASTE, EPI-SE), and one T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence (FLASH) was compared with a standard conventional T2-weighted SE sequence in 20 patients with focal liver lesions. Liver signal-to-noise ratio was highest for the FLASH sequence (54.3 +/- 8.3) and the HASTE (41.1 +/- 12.5) sequence, whereas the highest spleen-liver contrast-to-noise ratio was obtained by the TSE sequence (38.9 +/- 20.7). Lesion-liver CNR was highest with the TSE sequence (63.9 +/- 21.4). With both TSE and HASTE significantly (p < 0.01) more lesions were detected as compared with SE and EPI-SE sequences. Our results indicate that breath-hold TSE and HASTE sequences will eventually replace conventional T2-weighted SE techniques, due to their insensitivity to motion artifacts, superior lesion detectability and inherently short acquisition times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8972320     DOI: 10.1007/bf00240685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

Review 1.  First principles of fast spin echo.

Authors:  J Listerud; S Einstein; E Outwater; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1992-12

Review 2.  Ultra-fast imaging.

Authors:  M S Cohen; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  An aqueous gastrointestinal contrast agent for use in echo-planar MR imaging.

Authors:  P F Hahn; S Saini; M S Cohen; M Goldberg; P Reimer; P R Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  T1-weighted sequences for MR imaging of the liver: comparison of three techniques for single-breath, whole-volume acquisition at 1.0 and 1.5 T.

Authors:  R C Semelka; F C Simm; M Recht; M Deimling; G Lenz; G A Laub
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  T1-weighted snapshot gradient-echo MR imaging of the abdomen.

Authors:  A E Holsinger-Bampton; S J Riederer; N G Campeau; R L Ehman; C D Johnson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Liver metastases: detection with MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

Authors:  J W Reinig; A J Dwyer; D L Miller; J A Frank; G W Adams; A E Chang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Hepatic neoplasia: breath-hold MR imaging.

Authors:  M L Winkler; R F Thoeni; N Luh; L Kaufman; A R Margulis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Echo-planar MR imaging.

Authors:  R R Edelman; P Wielopolski; F Schmitt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  MR imaging of the liver using short TI inversion recovery sequences.

Authors:  G M Bydder; R E Steiner; L H Blumgart; S Khenia; I R Young
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Initial feasibility studies using single-shot EPI for the detection of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  P Reimer; R Ladebeck; E J Rummeny; H Repp; F Schmitt; G Bongartz; G Schuierer; T Lange; P E Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  M Trede; B Rumstadt; K Wendl; J Gaa; K Tesdal; K J Lehmann; H J Meier-Willersen; P Pescatore; J Schmoll
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Bile Duct Strictures Caused by Solid Masses: MR in Differential Diagnosis and as a Prognostic Tool to Plan the Endoscopic Treatment.

Authors:  Tomasz Gorycki; Michał Studniarek
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.260

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.