Literature DB >> 21695501

Factors affecting encouragement of relatives among families with Lynch syndrome to seek medical assessment.

Noriko Ishii1, Masami Arai, Yurie Koyama, Masashi Ueno, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, Keiko Kazuma, Tetsuichiro Muto.   

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome, and members of affected families are at-risk for developing colorectal and other associated tumors. Such individuals should disseminate familial genetic information, so they can seek specific medical assessment or genetic testing to reduce mortality and morbidity rates by early detection. Since published results have been encouraging, we explored which factors influence the likelihood of good communication within families regarding medical assessment. We studied 40 individuals from 33 families who satisfied the Japanese clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome and their relatives at our hospital. We determined the status of relatives of the 40 individuals after genetic counseling and testing using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews based on pedigree charts. We also examined their knowledge or perception of colorectal cancer syndrome, levels of intimacy and whether or not they encouraged their relatives to have specific medical assessments. We found that 75% of the individuals advised their relatives to seek medical assessment, and any significant background factors that promoted such encouragement were observed. They tended to encourage first degree relatives and discuss the issue with other family members such as spouses before undertaking such attempts at encouragement. The reasons and methods of imparting encouragement were essentially identical. We also found that genetic testing for at-risk or more distant relatives was not encouraged so often. Therefore, providing individuals who have been tested for Lynch syndrome with opportunities for disseminating familial genetic information through appropriate genetic counseling is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21695501     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9462-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  14 in total

1.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Eric Legius
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Susan K Peterson; Sally W Vernon; Salma K Marani; Walter F Baile; Beatty G Watts; Christopher I Amos; Marsha L Frazier; Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Informing one's family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a retrospective exploratory study.

Authors:  Ilse Mesters; Marlein Ausems; Sophie Eichhorn; Hans Vasen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family members' perceptions about the duty to inform and health professionals' role in disseminating genetic information.

Authors:  Rebecca D Pentz; Susan K Peterson; Beatty Watts; Sally W Vernon; Patrick M Lynch; Laura M Koehly; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2005

6.  Psychosocial outcome following genetic risk counselling for familial colorectal cancer. A comparison of affected patients and family members.

Authors:  M Keller; R Jost; C M Haunstetter; H Sattel; C Schroeter; U Bertsch; F Cremer; P Kienle; M Tariverdian; M Kloor; J Gebert; A Brechtel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshie Murakami; Hitoshi Okamura; Kokichi Sugano; Teruhiko Yoshida; Keiko Kazuma; Tatsuo Akechi; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Henry Lynch; Jane Lynch; David Main; Susan Kucharski; Anil K Rustgi; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-27

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.

Authors:  C Carlsson; M Nilbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multilevel research and the challenges of implementing genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Ralph J Coates; Mary L Fennell; Russell E Glasgow; Maren T Scheuner; Sheri D Schully; Marc S Williams; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  Patterns of family communication and preferred resources for sharing information among families with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Authors:  Jenna Petersen; Cathryn Koptiuch; Yelena P Wu; Ryan Mooney; Ashley Elrick; Kathryn Szczotka; Megan Keener; Lisa Pappas; Priyanka Kanth; Andrew Soisson; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-07-26

Review 3.  Barriers and facilitators for cascade testing in genetic conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Swetha Srinivasan; Nae Yeon Won; W David Dotson; Sarah T Wright; Megan C Roberts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Swetha Srinivasan; Heather Hampel; Jennifer Leeman; Amit Patel; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Daniel S Reuland; Megan C Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-07-29

5.  The structure of emotional support networks in families affected by Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher Steven Marcum; Dawn Lea; Dina Eliezer; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press)       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 6.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Family communication in a population at risk for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Brittany Batte; Jane P Sheldon; Patricia Arscott; Darcy J Huismann; Lisa Salberg; Sharlene M Day; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary Jane Esplen; Susan K Peterson; Christi A Patten; Jan Lowery; Frank A Sinicrope; Sandra K Nigon; Joyce Borgen; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Louise A Keogh; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.