Literature DB >> 15951968

Informing one's family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a retrospective exploratory study.

Ilse Mesters1, Marlein Ausems, Sophie Eichhorn, Hans Vasen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The family-link approach of case finding is considered the fastest and most efficient approach to trace people with hereditary disease. Therefore, there is a need to understand if, why, and how people with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) inform their biological family. AIM: To explore people's perspective on informing one's biological family regarding a hereditary predisposition for HNPCC.
METHOD: In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 people recruited from the database of the Netherlands Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours (STOET). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically.
FINDINGS: Disclosure was stimulated if people felt morally obliged to do so or when they anticipated regret if something happened because it is preventable. Motivation to disclose seemed to increase if there were, especially fatal, cancer cases in the family. Presence of external cues (e.g. professionals) appeared important for disclosure as well. Disrupted and tense family relations were reasons not to disclose, as well as young age of the message recipients and negative experiences at their first attempt to disclose (a novel finding). Disclosure was merely restricted to the nuclear family. A personal approach in this respect was preferred. With respect to content of the disclosure, participants reported to solely announce the presence of the hereditary defect and the possibility of testing. It was mostly considered the recipients' responsibility and own choice to obtain further (technical/medical) information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951968     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-004-7992-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  19 in total

1.  Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy.

Authors:  M B Daly; A Barsevick; S M Miller; R Buckman; J Costalas; S Montgomery; R Bingler
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-10

Review 2.  Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: the psychosocial issues.

Authors:  Jeannie V Pasacreta; Linda Jacobs; Janine K Cataldo
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.220

3.  Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing.

Authors:  M McAllister
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Eric Legius
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Family Communication and Genetic Counseling: The Case of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  J Green; M Richards; F Murton; H Statham; N Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Transmitting genetic risk information in families: attitudes about disclosing the identity of relatives.

Authors:  J T Wilcke; N Seersholm; A Kok-Jensen; A Dirksen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: a cancer risk assessment program's experience.

Authors:  Josephine Wagner Costalas; Mark Itzen; John Malick; James S Babb; Betsy Bove; Andrew K Godwin; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 8.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.

Authors:  W Burke; G Petersen; P Lynch; J Botkin; M Daly; J Garber; M J Kahn; A McTiernan; K Offit; E Thomson; C Varricchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Family history in an oncology clinic. Implications for cancer genetics.

Authors:  H T Lynch; K L Follett; P M Lynch; W A Albano; J L Mailliard; R L Pierson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Barbara M Brogan; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-06
View more
  36 in total

1.  Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-24

2.  The role of genetics in the provision of essential public health services.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Carolyn Watts
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: communication with close and distant relatives.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Beth Ford; Rowena C Mercado; Darashana Punglia; Wendy Kohlmann; Peggy Conrad; Amie Blanco; Kristen M Shannon; Mark Powell; Stephen B Gruber; Jonathan Terdiman; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Patterns of family communication and preferred resources for sharing information among families with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Authors:  Jenna Petersen; Cathryn Koptiuch; Yelena P Wu; Ryan Mooney; Ashley Elrick; Kathryn Szczotka; Megan Keener; Lisa Pappas; Priyanka Kanth; Andrew Soisson; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-07-26

5.  Evaluating the utilization of educational materials in communicating about Lynch syndrome to at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Kristen Dilzell; Kerry Kingham; Kelly Ormond; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Perceived intrafamily melanoma risk communication.

Authors:  Lois J Loescher; Janice D Crist; Leilani A C L Siaki
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Disclosure of genetics research results after the death of the patient participant: a qualitative study of the impact on relatives.

Authors:  E Ormondroyd; C Moynihan; M Watson; C Foster; S Davolls; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 9.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Babs G Taal; Miranda A Gerritsma; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.