Literature DB >> 12476445

Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

Erna Claes1, Gerry Evers-Kiebooms, Andrea Boogaerts, Marleen Decruyenaere, Lieve Denayer, Eric Legius.   

Abstract

The psychological aspects of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in cancer patients (diagnostic genetic testing) have so far received less attention than predictive genetic testing in unaffected persons. Our study is aimed at gaining insight into the psychological aspects of diagnostic genetic testing and at formulating practical recommendations for counseling. Cancer patients often play a key role in the communication of information to relatives because they were the first individuals to be tested in the family. The present article focuses on the communication to close and distant relatives about the hereditary cancer, the genetic test and its result. Participants previously diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer, with a family history of these cancers and who requested DNA-testing, were eligible for the study. Of the 83 eligible patients who could be contacted, 63 participated (response rate = 76%). Twenty-six participants were members of a family where a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was detected. The DNA-analysis in the family of 37 participants had not revealed any mutation. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and psychological tests and questionnaires. The dissemination of information was largely focused on first-degree relatives. Communication to distant relatives about the genetic test and its result was problematic. Other than the genetic test result and age as "objective" predictors of informing distant relatives, little and/or superficial contact seemed to be the major subjective barrier to informing distant relatives. Furthermore, the knowledge about HBOC of these messengers reveals several shortcomings. Communication within the family should receive special attention during counseling. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12476445     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  85 in total

Review 1.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  The development of a methodology for examining the process of family communication of genetic test results.

Authors:  Jonathan A Smith; Caroline Dancyger; Melissa Wallace; Chris Jacobs; Susan Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Disclosing cancer genetic information within families: perspectives of counselees and their at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Claudia Lampic; Richard Rosenquist; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 5.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder.

Authors:  G K Suthers; J Armstrong; J McCormack; D Trott
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  An exploration of the communication preferences regarding genetic testing in individuals from families with identified breast/ovarian cancer mutations.

Authors:  Paboda Ratnayake; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser; Graeme Suthers; Melanie A Price; Jessica Duffy; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: communication with close and distant relatives.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Beth Ford; Rowena C Mercado; Darashana Punglia; Wendy Kohlmann; Peggy Conrad; Amie Blanco; Kristen M Shannon; Mark Powell; Stephen B Gruber; Jonathan Terdiman; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Women's satisfaction with genetic counseling for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: psychological aspects.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Tiffani A Demarco; Bryn D Mars; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.