Literature DB >> 32727822

Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.

Swetha Srinivasan1, Heather Hampel2, Jennifer Leeman3, Amit Patel4, Alanna Kulchak Rahm5, Daniel S Reuland6, Megan C Roberts7.   

Abstract

Cascade testing (i.e., genetic testing of family members of individuals with disease) among families affected by hereditary cancer disorders, such as Lynch syndrome, is suboptimal and thus represents a missed opportunity in cancer prevention. We aimed to fill a gap in the literature by exploring multilevel barriers and facilitators to the implementation of cascade testing for Lynch syndrome. We conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Integrated Behavioral Model among key stakeholders (n = 60): Patients with Lynch syndrome and relatives (n = 20), providers (n = 20), and administrators (n = 20). Transcripts were double-coded (20% sample) using template analysis in ATLAS.ti. Barriers identified included (i) low awareness about Lynch syndrome, (ii) psychosocial barriers, (iii) lack of provider follow-up, (iv) accessibility to genetic counseling, and (v) fear of discrimination. Facilitators included (i) motivation to engage in cascade testing and (ii) free genetic testing offered to relatives. Stakeholders also recommended strategies to overcome implementation barriers in the short-term (increasing education, preparing patients for communicating with relatives), medium-term (optimizing clinical workflow and staffing resources), and long-term (nationwide standardization). These findings indicate that modifiable, multilevel barriers to the implementation of cascade testing in Lynch syndrome are experienced across stakeholders. Understanding and targeting implementation barriers is imperative to achieving public health impact of precision health interventions such as cascade testing. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32727822      PMCID: PMC7718347          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  21 in total

1.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  "For all my family's sake, I should go and find out": an Australian report on genetic counseling and testing uptake in individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Claire E Wakefield; Paboda Ratnayake; Bettina Meiser; Graeme Suthers; Melanie A Price; Jessica Duffy; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-01-23

3.  The search for unaffected individuals with Lynch syndrome: do the ends justify the means?

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-01

4.  Outcome of case finding among relatives of patients with known heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  D Bhatnagar; J Morgan; S Siddiq; M I Mackness; J P Miller; P N Durrington
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 5.  Screening and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia - Lessons from the past and opportunities for the future (based on the Anitschkow Lecture 2014).

Authors:  Joost Besseling; Barbara Sjouke; John J P Kastelein
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 5.162

6.  Factors affecting encouragement of relatives among families with Lynch syndrome to seek medical assessment.

Authors:  Noriko Ishii; Masami Arai; Yurie Koyama; Masashi Ueno; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Keiko Kazuma; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Prevalence and Penetrance of Major Genes and Polygenes for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Mark A Jenkins; James G Dowty; Antonis C Antoniou; Andrew Lee; Graham G Giles; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark Clendenning; Christophe Rosty; Dennis J Ahnen; Stephen N Thibodeau; Graham Casey; Steven Gallinger; Loïc Le Marchand; Robert W Haile; John D Potter; Yingye Zheng; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; John L Hopper; Robert J MacInnis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Angela Fenwick; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Gillian Crawford; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A qualitative study of barriers to genetic counseling and potential for mobile technology education among women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Kristin Niendorf; Heewon Lee; Sue Petzel; Hee Yun Lee; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.