Literature DB >> 21677853

Complete genome sequence of Deinococcus maricopensis type strain (LB-34).

Rüdiger Pukall, Ahmet Zeytun, Susan Lucas, Alla Lapidus, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Matt Nolan, Jan-Fang Cheng, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Mikhailova, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amrita Pati, Roxane Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, J Chris Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Deinococcus maricopensis (Rainey and da Costa 2005) is a member of the genus Deinococcus, which is comprised of 44 validly named species and is located within the deeply branching bacterial phylum Deinococcus-Thermus. Strain LB-34(T) was isolated from a soil sample from the Sonoran Desert in Arizona. Various species of the genus Deinococcus are characterized by extreme radiation resistance, with D. maricopensis being resistant in excess of 10 kGy. Even though the genomes of three Deinococcus species, D. radiodurans, D. geothermalis and D. deserti, have already been published, no special physiological characteristic is currently known that is unique to this group. It is therefore of special interest to analyze the genomes of additional species of the genus Deinococcus to better understand how these species adapted to gamma- or UV ionizing-radiation. The 3,498,530 bp long genome of D. maricopensis with its 3,301 protein-coding and 66 RNA genes consists of one circular chromosome and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deinococcaceae; GEBA; Gram-positive; aerobic; chemoorganotrophic; mesophilic; non-motile; radiation-resistant

Year:  2011        PMID: 21677853      PMCID: PMC3111983          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1633949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain LB-34T (= DSM 21211 = NRRL B-23946 = LMG 22137) is the type strain of Deinococcus maricopensis [1]. In addition to the type strain LB-34T, two more strains of this species, KR 1 and KR 23, were characterized by Rainey et al. [1]. The generic name derives from the Greek words ‘deinos’ meaning ‘strange or unusual’ and ‘coccus’ meaning ‘a grain or berry’ [2]. The species epithet is derived from the Neo-Latin word ‘maricopensis’ referring to the Maricopa Nation, a native tribe in Arizona [1]. Strain LB 34T was isolated from desert soil in Arizona and described by Rainey et al. in 2005 [1]. The genus Deinococcus was proposed in 1981 by Brooks and Murray [2] to separate the distinct radiation-resistant species from the genus Micrococcus in which those species were originally classified. With the description of Deinobacter grandis by Oyaizu et al. [3], a second genus was placed to the family Deinococcaceae, and in 1997 Rainey et al. proposed to transfer Deinobacter to the genus Deinococcus, based on investigations of the phylogenetic diversity of the Deinococci as determined by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. In conclusion, an emended description of the genus Deinococcus was published, showing that the cells can be spherical or rod-shaped [4]. Members of the genus Deinococcus were isolated from various environmental habitats including air [5-7], arid soil [1,8-12], water and activated sludge [13-15], alpine environments [16], rhizosphere [17], Antarctica [18], hot springs [19], aquifer [20], marine fish [21] and radioactive sites [22]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for D. maricopensis LB-34T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain LB-34T was compared using NCBI BLAST under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [23] and the relative frequencies, weighted by BLAST scores, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [24]) were determined. The single most frequent genus was Deinococcus (100.0%) (114 hits in total). Regarding the three hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.9%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 97.6%. Regarding the 77 hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 91.5%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 60.5%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was D. radiodurans, which corresponded to an identity of 91.2% and an HSP coverage of 88.0%. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AY905380 ('Extensive ionizing-radiation-resistant recovered sonoran and description nine new species genus Deinococcus obtained single mixed agricultural/open desert soil clone L14-471'), which showed an identity of 98.1% and a HSP coverage of 70.2%. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'skin' (7.7%), 'litholog/stream' (2.8%), 'fossa' (2.4%), 'microbi' (2.4%) and 'forearm' (2.1%) (136 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of D. maricopensis LB-34T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the four identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ by one nucleotide from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AY743274).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of D. maricopensis relative to the other type strains within the family Deinococcaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,382 aligned characters [25,26] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [27] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [28] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [29] are shown in blue, and published genomes in bold [30-34]. The genome of D. radiodurans published by White at al. in 1999 [35] later turned out not to be from the type strain [36].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of D. maricopensis relative to the other type strains within the family Deinococcaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,382 aligned characters [25,26] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [27] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [28] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [29] are shown in blue, and published genomes in bold [30-34]. The genome of D. radiodurans published by White at al. in 1999 [35] later turned out not to be from the type strain [36]. The cells of D. maricopensis are rod-shaped, up to 6 µm in length and 2.0 µm wide (Figure 2). D. maricopensis is a Gram-positive, non-spore-forming bacterium (Table 1). Colonies on Rich medium are orange to pink. The cells are non-motile. The organism is chemoorganotrophic [1]. The temperature range for growth is 10° to 45°C, with an optimum at 40°C [1]. Cytochrome oxidase and catalase activity have been observed [1]. Strains may utilize L-arabinose, cellobiose, galactose, glucose, mannose, maltose, sucrose, trehalose, glucosamine, glycerol, malate, asparagine, aspartate, glutamate, L-glutamine, ornithine and proline. Fructose can be used by strain KR23, but not by strain LB-34T [1]. Strain LB-34T showed similar levels of desiccation tolerance of up to four weeks as compared to D. radiodurans strain R1T. Strain LB-34T is resistant to > 10kGy, but more sensitive to ionizing radiation than strain D. radiodurans R1T [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of D. maricopensis LB-34T

Table 1

Classification and general features of D. maricopensis LB-34Taccording to the MIGS recommendations [37].

MIGS ID    Property    Term    Evidence code
    Current classification    Domain Bacteria    TAS [38]
    Phylum Deinococcus-Thermus    TAS [39]
    Class Deinococci    TAS [40,41]
    Order Deinococcales    TAS [4]
    Family Deinococcaceae    TAS [2,4]
    Genus Deinococcus    TAS [2,4]
    Species Deinococcus maricopensis    TAS [1,42]
    Type strain LB-34    TAS [1]
    Gram stain    positive    TAS [1]
    Cell shape    rods    TAS [1]
    Motility    non-motile    TAS [1]
    Sporulation    none    TAS [1]
    Temperature range    mesophile, 10°C–45°C    TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature    40°C    TAS [1]
    Salinity    not reported
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement    aerobic    TAS [1]
    Carbon source    carbohydrates    TAS [1]
    Energy metabolism    chemoorganotroph    TAS [1,2]
MIGS-6    Habitat    soil    TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship    free-living    NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity    none    NAS
    Biosafety level    1    TAS [43]
    Isolation    soil    TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location    Sonoran Desert, Arizona, USA    TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time    1999    NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude    32.93    NAS
MIGS-4.2    Longitude    -112.30    NAS
MIGS-4.3    Depth    not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude    not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [44]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of D. maricopensis LB-34T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [44]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

The major cellular fatty acids of the strain LB-34T were identified as iso-C15:0, iso-C17:0 and C16:0. Menaquinone 8 (MK-8) was determined as the major respiratory quinone of the strain. Phosphoglycolipid and glycolipid pattern are similar to those of other Deinococcus species [1]. No data are available for strain LB-34T showing the peptidoglycan type of the cell wall.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [45], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [46]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [29] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property     Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used     Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,     one 454 PE library (7 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms     Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage     170.9 × Illumina; 75.4 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers     Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-10-21-2009-gcc-4.1.2-threads,     Velvet version 0.7.63, phrap
MIGS-32     Gene calling method     Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
     INSDC ID     CP002454
     Genbank Date of Release     January 20, 2011
     GOLD ID     Gc01597
     NCBI project ID     43461
     Database: IMG-GEBA     2503982045
MIGS-13     Source material identifier     DSM 21211
     Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

D. maricopensis LB-34T, DSM 21211, was grown in DSMZ medium 736 (Rich Medium) [47] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with a modification in cell lysis by adding 20 μl lysozyme (100 mg/μl), and 10 μl mutanolysine, achromopeptidase and lysostphine, each, for 40 min at 37°C, followed by one hour incubation on ice after the MPC step. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [48,49].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [50]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.3 (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 58 contigs in two scaffolds was converted into a phrap assembly by [51] making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (957.8 Mb) were assembled with Velvet version 0.7.63 [52] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 234.5 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [51] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [50], Dupfinisher [53], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 255 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [54]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 246.3 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 872,337 pyrosequence and 16,604,657 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [55] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [56]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [57].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 3,498,530 bp long chromosome with a G+C content of 69.8% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,367 genes predicted, 3,301 were protein-coding genes, and 66 RNAs; 37 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (70.3%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)    3,498,530   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    3,127,041   89.38%
DNA G+C content (bp)    2,442,849   69.83%
Number of replicons    1
Extrachromosomal elements    0
Total genes    3,367   100.00%
RNA genes    66   1.96%
rRNA operons    4
Protein-coding genes    3,301   98.04%
Pseudo genes    37   1.10%
Genes with function prediction    2,366   70.27%
Genes in paralog clusters    368   10.93%
Genes assigned to COGs    2,412   71.64%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    2,495   74.10%
Genes with signal peptides    1,005   29.85%
Genes with transmembrane helices    662   19.66%
CRISPR repeats    0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value    %age      Description
J    160    6.0      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.0      RNA processing and modification
K    188    7.1      Transcription
L    109    4.1      Replication, recombination and repair
B    2    0.1      Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    29    1.1      Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0      Nuclear structure
V    45    1.7      Defense mechanisms
T    195    7.3      Signal transduction mechanisms
M    137    5.2      Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    15    0.6      Cell motility
Z    1    0.0      Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0      Extracellular structures
U    43    1.6      Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    113    4.3      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    125    4.7      Energy production and conversion
G    205    7.7      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    237    8.9      Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    77    2.9      Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    119    4.5      Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    105    4.0      Lipid transport and metabolism
P    121    4.6      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    60    2.3      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    334    12.6      General function prediction only
S    238    9.0      Function unknown
-    955    28.4      Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  44 in total

1.  Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs.

Authors:  Christopher Lee; Catherine Grasso; Mark F Sharlow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction.

Authors:  W G Weisburg; S J Giovannoni; C R Woese
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 3.  En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria?

Authors:  H-P Klenk; M Göker
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Extensive diversity of ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran Desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus obtained from a single soil sample.

Authors:  Fred A Rainey; Keren Ray; Margarida Ferreira; Bridget Z Gatz; M Fernanda Nobre; Danielle Bagaley; Brian A Rash; Mie-Jung Park; Ashlee M Earl; Nicole C Shank; Alanna M Small; Margaret C Henk; John R Battista; Peter Kämpfer; Milton S da Costa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia N Ivanova; I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Deinococcus aerolatus sp. nov. and Deinococcus aerophilus sp. nov., isolated from air samples.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Yoo; Hang-Yeon Weon; Soo-Jin Kim; Yi-Seul Kim; Byung-Yong Kim; Soon-Wo Kwon
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification.

Authors:  Doug Hyatt; Gwo-Liang Chen; Philip F Locascio; Miriam L Land; Frank W Larimer; Loren J Hauser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Deinococcus aquiradiocola sp. nov., isolated from a radioactive site in Japan.

Authors:  Dalal Asker; Tarek S Awad; Teruhiko Beppu; Kenji Ueda
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Deinococcus indicus sp. nov., an arsenic-resistant bacterium from an aquifer in West Bengal, India.

Authors:  K Suresh; G S N Reddy; S Sengupta; S Shivaji
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Deinococcus geothermalis: the pool of extreme radiation resistance genes shrinks.

Authors:  Kira S Makarova; Marina V Omelchenko; Elena K Gaidamakova; Vera Y Matrosova; Alexander Vasilenko; Min Zhai; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Edwin Kim; Miriam Land; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Samuel Pitluck; Paul M Richardson; Chris Detter; Thomas Brettin; Elizabeth Saunders; Barry Lai; Bruce Ravel; Kenneth M Kemner; Yuri I Wolf; Alexander Sorokin; Anna V Gerasimova; Mikhail S Gelfand; James K Fredrickson; Eugene V Koonin; Michael J Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Unique substrate specificity of purine nucleoside phosphorylases from Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Fumiaki Tomoike; Seiki Kuramitsu; Ryoji Masui
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Interaction of double-stranded DNA with polymerized PprA protein from Deinococcus radiodurans.

Authors:  Motoyasu Adachi; Hiroshi Hirayama; Rumi Shimizu; Katsuya Satoh; Issay Narumi; Ryota Kuroki
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Conservation and diversity of radiation and oxidative stress resistance mechanisms in Deinococcus species.

Authors:  Sangyong Lim; Jong-Hyun Jung; Laurence Blanchard; Arjan de Groot
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 16.408

4.  Complete genome sequence of Truepera radiovictrix type strain (RQ-24).

Authors:  Natalia Ivanova; Christine Rohde; Christine Munk; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Brian J Tindall; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-02-22

5.  Complete genome sequence of the orange-red pigmented, radioresistant Deinococcus proteolyticus type strain (MRP(T)).

Authors:  Alex Copeland; Ahmet Zeytun; Montri Yassawong; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Johannes Sikorski; Rüdiger Pukall; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-04-27

6.  Genome sequence and transcriptome analysis of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus gobiensis: insights into the extreme environmental adaptations.

Authors:  Menglong Yuan; Ming Chen; Wei Zhang; Wei Lu; Jin Wang; Mingkun Yang; Peng Zhao; Ran Tang; Xinna Li; Yanhua Hao; Zhengfu Zhou; Yuhua Zhan; Haiying Yu; Chao Teng; Yongliang Yan; Shuzhen Ping; Yingdian Wang; Min Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Unraveling adaptation of Pontibacter korlensis to radiation and infertility in desert through complete genome and comparative transcriptomic analysis.

Authors:  Jun Dai; Wenkui Dai; Chuangzhao Qiu; Zhenyu Yang; Yi Zhang; Mengzhou Zhou; Lei Zhang; Chengxiang Fang; Qiang Gao; Qiao Yang; Xin Li; Zhi Wang; Zhiyong Wang; Zhenhua Jia; Xiong Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  DrwH, a novel WHy domain-containing hydrophobic LEA5C protein from Deinococcus radiodurans, protects enzymatic activity under oxidative stress.

Authors:  Shijie Jiang; Jin Wang; Xiaoli Liu; Yingying Liu; Cui Guo; Liwen Zhang; Jiahui Han; Xiaoli Wu; Dong Xue; Ahmed E Gomaa; Shuai Feng; Heng Zhang; Yun Chen; Shuzhen Ping; Ming Chen; Wei Zhang; Liang Li; Zhengfu Zhou; Kaijing Zuo; Xufeng Li; Yi Yang; Min Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Predicted Cold Shock Proteins from the Extremophilic Bacterium Deinococcus maricopensis and Related Deinococcus Species.

Authors:  Michael J LaGier
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 10.  Thiol Reductases in Deinococcus Bacteria and Roles in Stress Tolerance.

Authors:  Arjan de Groot; Laurence Blanchard; Nicolas Rouhier; Pascal Rey
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.