| Literature DB >> 28839181 |
Shijie Jiang1,2, Jin Wang2, Xiaoli Liu2, Yingying Liu2, Cui Guo2, Liwen Zhang2, Jiahui Han2, Xiaoli Wu2, Dong Xue2, Ahmed E Gomaa2, Shuai Feng2, Heng Zhang2, Yun Chen2,3, Shuzhen Ping2, Ming Chen2, Wei Zhang2, Liang Li2, Zhengfu Zhou2, Kaijing Zuo3, Xufeng Li1, Yi Yang1, Min Lin4.
Abstract
Water stress and hypersensitive response (WHy) domain is typically found as a component of atypical late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins closely associated with resistance to multiple stresses in numerous organisms. Several putative LEA proteins have been identified in Deinococcus bacteria; however their precise function remains unclear. This work reports the characterization of a Deinococcus-specific gene encoding a novel WHy domain-containing hydrophobic LEA5C protein (named DrwH) in D. radiodurans R1. The expression of the drwH gene was induced by oxidative and salinity stresses. Inactivation of this gene resulted in increased sensitivity to oxidative and salinity stresses as well as reduced activities of antioxidant enzymes. The WHy domain of the DrwH protein differs structurally from that of a previously studied bacterial LEA5C protein, dWHy1, identified as a gene product from an Antarctic desert soil metagenome library. Further analysis indicated that in E. coli, the function of DrwH is related to oxidative stress tolerance, whereas dWHy1 is associated with freezing-thawing stress tolerance. Under oxidative stress induced by H2O2, DrwH protected the enzymatic activities of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). These findings provide new insight into the evolutionary and survival strategies of Deinococcus bacteria under extreme environmental conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28839181 PMCID: PMC5570939 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09541-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Hydropathy and disorder prediction of intact and truncated DrwH proteins without putative signal peptide. (A) Hydropathic index plot of the deduced DrwH amino acid sequence analyzed using the Kyte–Doolittle algorithm. Regions with a hydropathy score above zero are hydrophobic. (B) Prediction of DrwH disordered regions using Cspritz. Regions with scores above the threshold line are considered to be disordered. (C) Hydropathic index plot of the deduced amino acid sequence of truncated DrwH analyzed using the Kyte–Doolittle algorithm. (D) Prediction of truncated DrwH disordered regions using Cspritz.
Figure 2Transcriptional analysis of drwH in D. radiodurans. (A) Relative expression level of drwH in response to various stresses in D. radiodurans. Total RNA of D. radiodurans was extracted after exposure to 50 mM H2O2 (30 min), 0.3 M NaCl (2 h), 50 °C (2 h), 15 °C (2 h), and 0.5 M D-sorbitol (2 h). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). (B) drwH transcription in D. radiodurans WT and ΔirrE mutant strains under oxidative and salt conditions. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean of 3 independent experiments. The asterisk indicates a significant difference, which was calculated with Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05, NS: no significant difference). (C) Nucleotide sequence of the putative promoter region of drwH. The open boxes represent the putative σ70-dependent promoter. The start and termination codons of the drwH gene are indicated in red bold letters. The 300-bp region containing a predicted WHy domain is highlighted in blue.
Figure 3Survival curves for D. radiodurans WT and ΔdrwH mutant following exposure to H2O2 (A), NaCl (B), and desiccation (C) treatments. Different dilutions of these cells were plated on TGY agar plates and incubated at 30 °C for 3 days before colonies were enumerated. The survival rate was expressed as the percentage of the number of colonies in the treated samples compared with those in untreated controls. All experiments were performed three times and are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4Expression and catalytic activities of ROS scavenging enzymes in D. radiodruans WT and ΔdrwH mutant strains under oxidative stress. (A) Effects of the drwH deletion on the enzyme activities after treatment with 50 mM H2O2 for 30 min. The asterisk indicates a significant difference, which was calculated with Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05, NS: no significant difference). (B) Effects of drwH deletion on the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes after treatment with 50 mM H2O2 for 30 min. All experiments were performed three times and are represented as mean ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Structural and functional analysis of the WHy-domains from DrwH and dWHy1. (A) Primary structure analysis of the DrwH protein, and the alignment between the WHy-domains from DrwH and dWHy1. (B) Survival phenotype plate assay of the E. coli wild-type strain BL21 and recombinant strains expressing Dr-WHy (truncated DrwH, BL21-1), dW-WHy (truncated dWHy1, BL21-2), and an empty vector (BL21-0) as a control, respectively, after treatment with 15 mM H2O2 for 10 min and two freezing-thawing cycles. (C) and (D) Protective effect of Dr-WHy on MDH and LDH activities after H2O2 treatment. The His-tagged Dr-WHy (truncated-DrwH) protein was used for the in vitro protection assays. Each column represents an average of three independent experiments, and error bars represent standard deviation. The statistical difference was tested by Student’s t-test (P < 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences.
Secondary structure prediction for the WHy domains of the D. radiodurans DrwH and the bacterial dWHy1 from an Antarctic desert soil metagenome library
| WHy domain | Alpha helix (%) | Extended strand (%) | Beta turn (%) | Random coil (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr-WHy | 15.00 | 38.00 | 5.00 | 42.00 |
| dW-WHy | 36.00 | 23.00 | 7.00 | 34.00 |