Literature DB >> 18635897

Quantitative assessment of the physical potential of proton beam range verification with PET/CT.

A Knopf1, K Parodi, H Paganetti, E Cascio, A Bonab, T Bortfeld.   

Abstract

A recent clinical pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of offline PET/CT range verification for proton therapy treatments. In vivo PET measurements are challenged by blood perfusion, variations of tissue compositions, patient motion and image co-registration uncertainties. Besides these biological and treatment specific factors, the accuracy of the method is constrained by the underlying physical processes. This phantom study distinguishes physical factors from other factors, assessing the reproducibility, consistency and sensitivity of the PET/CT range verification method. A spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP) proton field was delivered to a phantom consisting of poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA), lung and bone equivalent material slabs. PET data were acquired in listmode at a commercial PET/CT scanner available within 10 min walking distance from the proton therapy unit. The measured PET activity distributions were compared to simulations of the PET signal based on Geant4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) codes. To test the reproducibility of the measured PET signal, data from two independent measurements at the same geometrical position in the phantom were compared. Furthermore, activation depth profiles within identical material arrangements but at different positions within the irradiation field were compared to test the consistency of the measured PET signal. Finally, activation depth profiles through air/lung, air/bone and lung/bone interfaces parallel as well as at 6 degrees to the beam direction were studied to investigate the sensitivity of the PET/CT range verification method. The reproducibility and the consistency of the measured PET signal were found to be of the same order of magnitude. They determine the physical accuracy of the PET measurement to be about 1 mm. However, range discrepancies up to 2.6 mm between two measurements and range variations up to 2.6 mm within one measurement were found at the beam edge and at the edge of the field of view (FOV) of the PET scanner. PET/CT range verification was found to be able to detect small range modifications in the presence of complex tissue inhomogeneities. This study indicates the physical potential of the PET/CT verification method to detect the full-range characteristic of the delivered dose in the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635897     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  Improved MAGIC gel for higher sensitivity and elemental tissue equivalent 3D dosimetry.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Timothy G Reese; Elizabeth M Crowley; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Initial development of goCMC: a GPU-oriented fast cross-platform Monte Carlo engine for carbon ion therapy.

Authors:  Nan Qin; Marco Pinto; Zhen Tian; Georgios Dedes; Arnold Pompos; Steve B Jiang; Katia Parodi; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Validation of an in-vivo proton beam range check method in an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom using dose measurements.

Authors:  El H Bentefour; Shikui Tang; Ethan W Cascio; Mauro Testa; Deepak Samuel; Damien Prieels; Bernard Gottschalk; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Samuel España; Juliane Daartz; Norbert Liebsch; Jinsong Ouyang; Harald Paganetti; Thomas R Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy.

Authors:  S España; X Zhu; J Daartz; G El Fakhri; T Bortfeld; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Feasibility of proton-activated implantable markers for proton range verification using PET.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Uwe Titt; Harald Paganetti; Matthew Kerr; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  Determination of elemental tissue composition following proton treatment using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Georges El Fakhri; Harald Paganetti; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Brian A Winey; Kira Grogg; Mauro Testa; Georges El Fakhri; Thomas R Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  A Recommendation on How to Analyze In-Room PET for In Vivo Proton Range Verification Using a Distal PET Surface Method.

Authors:  Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Kira Grogg; Georges El Fakhri; Brian Winey; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.