Literature DB >> 21673663

Ultrasonic frogs show extraordinary sex differences in auditory frequency sensitivity.

Jun-Xian Shen1, Zhi-Min Xu, Zu-Lin Yu, Shuai Wang, De-Zhi Zheng, Shang-Chun Fan.   

Abstract

Acoustic communication has an important role in the reproductive behaviour of anurans. Although males of the concave-eared frog (Odorrana tormota) have shown an ultrasonic communication capacity adapted to the intense, predominately low-frequency ambient noise from local streams, whether the females communicate with ultrasound remains unclear. Here we present evidence that females exhibit no ultrasonic sensitivity. Acoustic playback experiments show that the calls from male evoke phonotaxis and vocal responses from gravid females, whereas the ultrasonic components (frequencies above 20 kHz) of the calls do not elicit any phonotaxis or vocalization in the females. Electrophysiological recordings from the auditory midbrain reveal an upper frequency limit at 16 kHz in females. Laser Doppler vibrometer measurements show that the velocity amplitude of the tympanic membranes peaks at 5 kHz in females and at ∼7 kHz in males. The auditory sex differences in O. tormota imply that ultrasonic hearing has evolved only in male anurans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673663     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  13 in total

1.  The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Albert S Feng; Wenyu Lin; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger; Roderick A Suthers; Chunhe Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. II. Intrapopulation variation and allometry.

Authors:  A C Keddy-Hector; W Wilczynski; M J Ryan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui.

Authors:  P M Narins; R R Capranica
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Sexual dimorphism and species differences in the neurophysiology and morphology of the acoustic communication system of two neotropical hylids.

Authors:  B E McClelland; W Wilczynski; A S Rand
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sex differences in the middle ear of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  M J Mason; C C Lin; P M Narins
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs.

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins; Chun-He Xu; Wen-Yu Lin; Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sexual differences in the tympanic frequency responses of the American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana)

Authors:  T E Hetherington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Albert S Feng; Zhi-Min Xu; Zu-Lin Yu; Victoria S Arch; Xin-Jian Yu; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Active control of ultrasonic hearing in frogs.

Authors:  Marcos Gridi-Papp; Albert S Feng; Jun-Xian Shen; Zu-Lin Yu; John J Rosowski; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  DPOAEs and tympanal membrane vibrations reveal adaptations of the sexually dimorphic ear of the concave-eared torrent frog, Odorrana tormota.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Albert S Feng; Fang Zhang; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.389

3.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea.

Authors:  Wei-Rong Liu; Jun-Xian Shen; Yu-Jiao Zhang; Zhi-Min Xu; Zhi Qi; Mao-Qiang Xue
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Han Yang; Guang-Lei Hu; Shan Li; Zhi-Min Xu; Zhi Qi; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-06

7.  Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of high-frequency hearing differences between the sexes of Odorrana tormota.

Authors:  Zhuo Chen; Yao Liu; Rui Liang; Chong Cui; Yanjun Zhu; Fang Zhang; Jie Zhang; Xiaohong Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  The importance of ambient sound level to characterise anuran habitat.

Authors:  Sandra Goutte; Alain Dubois; Frédéric Legendre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Females and males respond differently to calls impaired by noise in a tree frog.

Authors:  Haodi Zhang; Bicheng Zhu; Ya Zhou; Qiaoling He; Xiaoqian Sun; Jichao Wang; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.