Literature DB >> 26260392

Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.

Jing Liu1, Han Yang1, Guang-Lei Hu1, Shan Li1, Zhi-Min Xu2, Zhi Qi3, Jun-Xian Shen4.   

Abstract

Ambient noise influences acoustic communication in animals. The concave-eared frogs (Odorrana tormota) produce high-frequency sound signals to avoid potential masking from noise. However, whether environmental noise has effect on the high-frequency hearing of frogs is largely unclear. By measuring the auditory evoked near-field potentials (AENFPs) from the torus semicircularis of the midbrain at frequencies 1-23 kHz in the presence of three noise levels, we found no significant difference in the peak-to-peak amplitude, threshold and latency of AENFP between low-level (35 dB SPL) background noise and mid-level (65 dB SPL) broadcast natural noise. For a natural noise level of 85 dB SPL, AENFP amplitude decreased and threshold and latency increased at frequencies 3-13 kHz. Spike counts evoked by stimuli at the best excitatory frequency under 85 dB SPL natural noise exposure were lower in 7-kHz CF neurons than in exposures to 35 and 65 dB SPL noise. However spike counts were similar for 14- and 20-kHz CF neurons at the three exposure levels. These findings indicate that environmental noise does not mask the responses of high-frequency tuned auditory neurons, and suggest that the acoustic communication system of O. tormota is efficiently adapted to noisy habitats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked near-field potential; Concave-eared frog; Noise; Odorrana tormota; Single TS unit

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26260392     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1035-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  18 in total

1.  Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.

Authors:  B Ronacher; C Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Noise susceptibility and immunity of phase locking in amphibian auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P M Narins; I Wagner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey.

Authors:  J M Sinnott; W C Stebbins; D B Moody
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masking patterns in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). II: Physiological effects.

Authors:  E G Freedman; M Ferragamo; A M Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory response characteristics of the piebald odorous frog and their implications.

Authors:  Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea.

Authors:  Wei-Rong Liu; Jun-Xian Shen; Yu-Jiao Zhang; Zhi-Min Xu; Zhi Qi; Mao-Qiang Xue
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Albert S Feng; Zhi-Min Xu; Zu-Lin Yu; Victoria S Arch; Xin-Jian Yu; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  "Silent" signals: Selective forces acting on ultrasonic communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.