Literature DB >> 24510208

Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea.

Wei-Rong Liu1, Jun-Xian Shen, Yu-Jiao Zhang, Zhi-Min Xu, Zhi Qi, Mao-Qiang Xue.   

Abstract

Acoustic communication is an important behavior in frog courtship. Male and female frogs of most species, except the concave-eared torrent frog Odorrana tormota, have largely similar audiograms. The large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) are sympatric with O. tormota, but have no ear canals. The difference in hearing between two sexes of the frog is unknown. We recorded auditory evoked near-field potentials and single-unit responses from the auditory midbrain (the torus semicircularis) to determine auditory frequency sensitivity and threshold. The results show that males have the upper frequency limit at 24 kHz and females have the upper limit at 16 kHz. The more sensitive frequency range is 3-15 kHz for males and 1-8 kHz for females. Males have the minimum threshold at 11 kHz (58 dB SPL), higher about 5 dB than that at 3 kHz for females. The best excitatory frequencies of single units are mostly between 3 and 5 kHz in females and at 7-8 kHz in males. The underlying mechanism of auditory sexual differences is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510208     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Albert S Feng; Wenyu Lin; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger; Roderick A Suthers; Chunhe Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) produce ultrasonic calls.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu; Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui.

Authors:  P M Narins; R R Capranica
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sexual dimorphism and species differences in the neurophysiology and morphology of the acoustic communication system of two neotropical hylids.

Authors:  B E McClelland; W Wilczynski; A S Rand
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Sex differences in the middle ear of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  M J Mason; C C Lin; P M Narins
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Auditory response characteristics of the piebald odorous frog and their implications.

Authors:  Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs.

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins; Chun-He Xu; Wen-Yu Lin; Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Sexual differences in the tympanic frequency responses of the American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana)

Authors:  T E Hetherington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ultrasound-evoked immediate early gene expression in the brainstem of the Chinese torrent frog, Odorrana tormota.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; Sabrina S Burmeister; Albert S Feng; Jun-Xian Shen; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hearing conspecific vocal signals alters peripheral auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Functional basis of the sexual dimorphism in the auditory fovea of the duetting bushcricket Ancylecha fenestrata.

Authors:  Jan Scherberich; Jennifer Hummel; Stefan Schöneich; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Han Yang; Guang-Lei Hu; Shan Li; Zhi-Min Xu; Zhi Qi; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Effect of the Level of Anesthesia on the Auditory Brainstem Response in the Emei Music Frog (Babina daunchina).

Authors:  Jianguo Cui; Bicheng Zhu; Guangzhan Fang; Ed Smith; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Preference of spectral features in auditory processing for advertisement calls in the music frogs.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Jing Yang; Jiangyan Shen; Di Shen; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Auditory brainstem responses in the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans (Testudoformes: Emydidae) reveal sexually dimorphic hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Tongliang Wang; Handong Li; Jianguo Cui; Xiaofei Zhai; Haitao Shi; Jichao Wang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.836

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.