Literature DB >> 26572136

Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Ian C Hall1,2, Sarah M N Woolley3, Ursula Kwong-Brown4,5, Darcy B Kelley4.   

Abstract

Mating depends on the accurate detection of signals that convey species identity and reproductive state. In African clawed frogs, Xenopus, this information is conveyed by vocal signals that differ in temporal patterns and spectral features between sexes and across species. We characterized spectral sensitivity using auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs), commonly known as the auditory brainstem response, in males and females of four Xenopus species. In female X. amieti, X. petersii, and X. laevis, peripheral auditory sensitivity to their species own dyad-two, species-specific dominant frequencies in the male advertisement call-is enhanced relative to males. Males were most sensitive to lower frequencies including those in the male-directed release calls. Frequency sensitivity was influenced by endocrine state; ovariectomized females had male-like auditory tuning while dihydrotestosterone-treated, ovariectomized females maintained female-like tuning. Thus, adult, female Xenopus demonstrate an endocrine-dependent sensitivity to the spectral features of conspecific male advertisement calls that could facilitate mating. Xenopus AEPs resemble those of other species in stimulus and level dependence, and in sensitivity to anesthetic (MS222). AEPs were correlated with body size and sex within some species. A frequency following response, probably encoded by the amphibian papilla, might facilitate dyad source localization via interaural time differences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABR; Androgen; Matched filter; Sex difference; Xenopus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26572136      PMCID: PMC4699871          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1049-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  92 in total

1.  Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Paul M Forlano; David L Deitcher; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  G M Klump; J H Benedix; H C Gerhardt; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Temporal resolution in frog auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R Dunia; P M Narins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal competition in male Xenopus laevis frogs.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Anna Corke; Jeremy Korsh; David Yin; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Sensitivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system.

Authors:  G J Rose; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mechanical properties of the frog ear: vibration measurements under free- and closed-field acoustic conditions.

Authors:  A C Pinder; A R Palmer
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-10-22

7.  Perception of the simple difference tone (f2-f1).

Authors:  L E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Mirja Kits; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks.

Authors:  Tomonari Akamatsu; Tsuyoshi Okumura; Nicola Novarini; Hong Y Yan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Mark A Bee; Megan D Gall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Probing forebrain to hindbrain circuit functions in Xenopus.

Authors:  Darcy B Kelley; Taffeta M Elliott; Ben J Evans; Ian C Hall; Elizabeth C Leininger; Heather J Rhodes; Ayako Yamaguchi; Erik Zornik
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Generation, Coordination, and Evolution of Neural Circuits for Vocal Communication.

Authors:  Darcy B Kelley; Irene H Ballagh; Charlotte L Barkan; Andres Bendesky; Taffeta M Elliott; Ben J Evans; Ian C Hall; Young Mi Kwon; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Elizabeth C Leininger; Emilie C Perez; Heather J Rhodes; Avelyne Villain; Ayako Yamaguchi; Erik Zornik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of intracerebroventricular arginine vasotocin on a female amphibian proceptive behavior.

Authors:  Sunny K Boyd
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Frequency sensitivity in Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus).

Authors:  Julia R Beatini; Glenn A Proudfoot; Megan D Gall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-06

8.  Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  The return to water in ancestral Xenopus was accompanied by a novel mechanism for producing and shaping vocal signals.

Authors:  Ursula Kwong-Brown; Martha L Tobias; Damian O Elias; Ian C Hall; Coen Ph Elemans; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.