Literature DB >> 1633555

Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. II. Intrapopulation variation and allometry.

A C Keddy-Hector1, W Wilczynski, M J Ryan.   

Abstract

We determined the influence of body size on the male advertisement call's dominant frequency and basilar papilla's (BP) tuning in male and female cricket frogs (Acris crepitans) in two Texas populations (Wimberley and Stengel Ranch). In both populations, call and tuning characters correlated negatively with body size; females were larger than males and their BPs were tuned to a lower frequency. Analysis of covariance showed that neither the sex difference in tuning nor the population differences in calls or tuning were due to the difference in body size alone, but instead represented differences in the allometric relationships of each character with body size. The analysis implied that differences between sexes or populations were due more to shifts in the Y-intercept rather than the slope of the relationship with body size. This suggests a developmental model in which sexes or populations possess resonant structures in the ear or larynx with similar growth rates but different starting points or initial growth phases, resulting in different frequency characteristics as adults. The examination of the relationship between female BP tuning and male call dominant frequency predicts potentially different patterns of sexual selection in the two populations, with the Wimberley population males subject to much greater directional selection for low frequency calls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1633555     DOI: 10.1159/000114121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  9 in total

1.  Seasonal plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Ultrasonic frogs show extraordinary sex differences in auditory frequency sensitivity.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu; Zu-Lin Yu; Shuai Wang; De-Zhi Zheng; Shang-Chun Fan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Midbrain auditory sensitivity in the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer): correlations with behavioral studies.

Authors:  B M Diekamp; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatus.

Authors:  Jingfeng Chen; Teppei Jono; Jianguo Cui; Xizi Yue; Yezhong Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the Weeping lizard.

Authors:  Antonieta Labra; Claudio Reyes-Olivares; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez; Nelson A Velásquez; Mario Penna; Paul H Delano; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.