Literature DB >> 16541072

Ultrasonic communication in frogs.

Albert S Feng1, Peter M Narins, Chun-He Xu, Wen-Yu Lin, Zu-Lin Yu, Qiang Qiu, Zhi-Min Xu, Jun-Xian Shen.   

Abstract

Among vertebrates, only microchiropteran bats, cetaceans and some rodents are known to produce and detect ultrasounds (frequencies greater than 20 kHz) for the purpose of communication and/or echolocation, suggesting that this capacity might be restricted to mammals. Amphibians, reptiles and most birds generally have limited hearing capacity, with the ability to detect and produce sounds below approximately 12 kHz. Here we report evidence of ultrasonic communication in an amphibian, the concave-eared torrent frog (Amolops tormotus) from Huangshan Hot Springs, China. Males of A. tormotus produce diverse bird-like melodic calls with pronounced frequency modulations that often contain spectral energy in the ultrasonic range. To determine whether A. tormotus communicates using ultrasound to avoid masking by the wideband background noise of local fast-flowing streams, or whether the ultrasound is simply a by-product of the sound-production mechanism, we conducted acoustic playback experiments in the frogs' natural habitat. We found that the audible as well as the ultrasonic components of an A. tormotus call can evoke male vocal responses. Electrophysiological recordings from the auditory midbrain confirmed the ultrasonic hearing capacity of these frogs and that of a sympatric species facing similar environmental constraints. This extraordinary upward extension into the ultrasonic range of both the harmonic content of the advertisement calls and the frog's hearing sensitivity is likely to have co-evolved in response to the intense, predominantly low-frequency ambient noise from local streams. Because amphibians are a distinct evolutionary lineage from microchiropterans and cetaceans (which have evolved ultrasonic hearing to minimize congestion in the frequency bands used for sound communication and to increase hunting efficacy in darkness), ultrasonic perception in these animals represents a new example of independent evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16541072     DOI: 10.1038/nature04416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  70 in total

1.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolutionary biology: Communication and speciation.

Authors:  Manuel Leal; Jonathan B Losos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Spiny frogs (Paini) illuminate the history of the Himalayan region and Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Jing Che; Wei-Wei Zhou; Jian-Sheng Hu; Fang Yan; Theodore J Papenfuss; David B Wake; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Richard A Peters; Barbara Clucas; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in "noisy" environments.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Beyond the limits: identifying the high-frequency detectors in the anuran ear.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Auditory response characteristics of the piebald odorous frog and their implications.

Authors:  Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 10.  Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear.

Authors:  Richard L M Schoffelen; Johannes M Segenhout; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.