Literature DB >> 16875238

Temporal properties in clear speech perception.

Sheng Liu1, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to study relative contributions of speaking rate, temporal envelope, and temporal fine structure to clear speech perception. Experiment I used uniform time scaling to match the speaking rate between clear and conversational speech. Experiment II decreased the speaking rate in conversational speech without processing artifacts by increasing silent gaps between phonetic segments. Experiment III created "auditory chimeras" by mixing the temporal envelope of clear speech with the fine structure of conversational speech, and vice versa. Speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners was measured over a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios to derive speech reception thresholds (SRT). The results showed that processing artifacts in uniform time scaling, particularly time compression, reduced speech intelligibility. Inserting gaps in conversational speech improved the SRT by 1.3 dB, but this improvement might be a result of increased short-term signal-to-noise ratios during level normalization. Data from auditory chimeras indicated that the temporal envelope cue contributed more to the clear speech advantage at high signal-to-noise ratios, whereas the temporal fine structure cue contributed more at low signal-to-noise ratios. Taken together, these results suggest that acoustic cues for the clear speech advantage are multiple and distributed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875238     DOI: 10.1121/1.2208427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to investigate the source of increased intelligibility in speakers with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Alexander Kain; Jennifer Lam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joseph Heng; Gabriela Cantarero; Mounya Elhilali; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Kristin Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Acoustic correlates of vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Hugo Quené
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Katherine M Simeon; Hillary E Snyder; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Acoustics of clear speech: effect of instruction.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden; Greg Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Noise hampers children's expressive word learning.

Authors:  Kristine Grohne Riley; Karla K McGregor
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2009-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.