Literature DB >> 21656331

High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations.

Willi A Kalender1, Marcel Beister, John M Boone, Daniel Kolditz, Sabrina V Vollmar, Michaela C C Weigel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mammography, today's standard imaging approach, has deficits with respect to the superimposition of anatomical structures. Dedicated CT of the breast so far indicated that it can provide superior soft-tissue imaging, but that it still has significant limitations with respect to spatial resolution and dose. We have assessed novel dedicated breast CT technology.
METHODS: Based on simulations and measurements we developed novel technology which uses direct-conversion CdTe material and photon-counting electronics with 100 μm detector element size for close to 100% dose efficiency. We assessed the potential for the imaging of microcalcifications of 100 to 200 μm diameter and soft-tissue lesions of 1 to 5 mm diameter by simulations at dose levels between 1 and 6 mGy.
RESULTS: Microcalcifications of 150 μm and soft-tissue lesions of 2 mm diameter were found to be clearly detectable at an average glandular dose of 3 mGy. Separate displays are required for high-resolution microcalcification and for low-resolution soft-tissue analysis. Total CT data acquisition time will be below 10 s.
CONCLUSION: Dedicated breast CT may eventually provide comprehensive diagnostic assessment of microcalcifications and soft-tissue structures at dose levels equivalent to or below those of two-view screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656331     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2169-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Ordered subset reconstruction for x-ray CT.

Authors:  F J Beekma; C Kamphuis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone; N Shah; T R Nelson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  What should the burden of proof be for acceptance of a new breast-cancer screening technique?

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 25-Oct 1       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Karen K Lindfors; Shonket Ray; Shih-Ying Huang; Laurel A Beckett; Wayne L Monsky; John M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT.

Authors:  Paul D Deak; Oliver Langner; Michael Lell; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Spectral optimization for dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Michaela Weigel; Sabrina V Vollmar; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Karen K Lindfors; John M Boone; Thomas R Nelson; Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; DeWitt F Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  38 in total

1.  Three dimensional dose distribution comparison of simple and complex acquisition trajectories in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Impact of lesion segmentation metrics on computer-aided diagnosis/detection in breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; Karen Drukker; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-24

3.  TICMR: Total Image Constrained Material Reconstruction via Nonlocal Total Variation Regularization for Spectral CT.

Authors:  Jiulong Liu; Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi; Xiaoqun Zhang; Hao Gao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Measurement of breast tissue composition with dual energy cone-beam computed tomography: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Level set segmentation of breast masses in contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT and evaluation of stopping criteria.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.

Authors:  S D Auweter; J Herzen; M Willner; S Grandl; K Scherer; F Bamberg; M F Reiser; F Pfeiffer; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Monochromatic breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: phase-contrast and phase-retrieved image comparison and full-volume reconstruction.

Authors:  Luca Brombal; Bruno Golosio; Fulvia Arfelli; Deborah Bonazza; Adriano Contillo; Pasquale Delogu; Sandro Donato; Giovanni Mettivier; Piernicola Oliva; Luigi Rigon; Angelo Taibi; Giuliana Tromba; Fabrizio Zanconati; Renata Longo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 8.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Breast tissue characterization with photon-counting spectral CT imaging: a postmortem breast study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Michael J Klopfer; Justin L Ducote; Fumitaro Masaki; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dual-energy CT for the evaluation of silicone breast implants.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Isabelle Himsl; Karin Hellerhoff; Doris Mayr; Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer; Nina Ditsch; Bernhard Krauss; Klaus Friese; Maximilian F Reiser; Miriam S Lenhard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.