Literature DB >> 15451209

What should the burden of proof be for acceptance of a new breast-cancer screening technique?

Martin J Yaffe1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15451209     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17121-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Nehmat Houssami; Bruce Armstrong; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

3.  High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Marcel Beister; John M Boone; Daniel Kolditz; Sabrina V Vollmar; Michaela C C Weigel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computed tomography for imaging the breast.

Authors:  John M Boone; Alex L C Kwan; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Karen K Lindfors; Thomas R Nelson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.