Literature DB >> 21653854

Dynamic updating of working memory resources for visual objects.

Nikos Gorgoraptis1, Raquel F G Catalao, Paul M Bays, Masud Husain.   

Abstract

Recent neurophysiological and imaging studies have investigated how neural representations underlying working memory (WM) are dynamically updated for objects presented sequentially. Although such studies implicate information encoded in oscillatory activity across distributed brain networks, interpretation of findings depends crucially on the underlying conceptual model of how memory resources are distributed. Here, we quantify the fidelity of human memory for sequences of colored stimuli of different orientation. The precision with which each orientation was recalled declined with increases in total memory load, but also depended on when in the sequence it appeared. When one item was prioritized, its recall was enhanced, but with corresponding decrements in precision for other objects. Comparison with the same number of items presented simultaneously revealed an additional performance cost for sequential display that could not be explained by temporal decay. Memory precision was lower for sequential compared with simultaneous presentation, even when each item in the sequence was presented at a different location. Importantly, stochastic modeling established this cost for sequential display was due to misbinding object features (color and orientation). These results support the view that WM resources can be dynamically and flexibly updated as new items have to be stored, but redistribution of resources with the addition of new items is associated with misbinding object features, providing important constraints and a framework for interpreting neural data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21653854      PMCID: PMC3124758          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Serial position effects in 2-alternative forced choice recognition: functional equivalence across visual and auditory modalities.

Authors:  Andrew J Johnson; Christopher Miles
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-12-22

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Decay and interference effects in visuospatial short-term memory.

Authors:  G J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.

Authors:  A A Wright; H C Santiago; S F Sands; D F Kendrick; R G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; Manja Lehmann; Michele Veldsman; Daniel J Mitchell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

10.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05
View more
  94 in total

1.  Set size effects on working memory precision are not due to an averaging of slots.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  A two-stage search of visual working memory: investigating speed in the change-detection paradigm.

Authors:  Amanda L Gilchrist; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Re-evaluating the relationships among filtering activity, unnecessary storage, and visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Michael A Busseri
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Hydrogels as dynamic memory with forgetting ability.

Authors:  Chengtao Yu; Honglei Guo; Kunpeng Cui; Xueyu Li; Ya Nan Ye; Takayuki Kurokawa; Jian Ping Gong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The success of the representation maintenance affects the memory-guided search processing: an ERP study.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  On the Short-Lived Nature of Working Memory: Drift and Decay in a Population-coding model.

Authors:  Benjamin Cuthbert; Dominic Standage
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Christopher L Blume; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Sequence structure organizes items in varied latent states of working memory neural network.

Authors:  Qiaoli Huang; Huihui Zhang; Huan Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.