Literature DB >> 25023891

A two-stage search of visual working memory: investigating speed in the change-detection paradigm.

Amanda L Gilchrist1, Nelson Cowan.   

Abstract

A popular procedure for investigating working memory processes has been the visual change-detection procedure. Models of performance based on that procedure, however, tend to be based on performance accuracy and treat working memory search as a one-step process, in which memory representations are compared to a test probe to determine if a match is present. To gain a clearer understanding of how search of these representations operate in the change-detection task, we examined reaction time in two experiments, with a single-item probe either located centrally or at the location of an array item. Contrary to current models of visual working memory capacity, our data point to a two-stage search process: a fast first step to check for the novelty of the probe and, in the absence of such novelty, a second, slower step to search exhaustively for a match between the test probe and a memory representation. In addition to these results, we found that participants tended not to use location information provided by the probe that theoretically could have abbreviated the search process. We suggest some basic revisions of current models of processing in this type of visual working memory task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25023891      PMCID: PMC4213246          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0704-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

1.  The role of interference in memory span.

Authors:  C P May; L Hasher; M J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  The structure of short-term memory scanning: an investigation using response time distribution models.

Authors:  Chris Donkin; Robert M Nosofsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  On perfect working-memory performance with large numbers of items.

Authors:  Jonathan E Thiele; Michael S Pratte; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

6.  Discrete-slots models of visual working-memory response times.

Authors:  Christopher Donkin; Robert M Nosofsky; Jason M Gold; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The number and quality of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-10

8.  How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey; Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

9.  Working memory inefficiency: minimal information is utilized in visual recognition tasks.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  The role of central attention in retrieval from visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Hagit Magen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Introduction to the special issue on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Kyle Hardman; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume; Katherine M Clark; Mackenzie A Sunday
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Working memory units are all in your head: Factors that influence whether features or objects are the favored units.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Informed guessing in change detection.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan; Kyle O Hardman; Robert H Logie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults.

Authors:  Amanda L Gilchrist; Audrey Duarte; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-07-24

7.  No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rob Udale; Simon Farrell; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

8.  No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rob Udale; Simon Farrell; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

9.  Perceptual stimuli with novel bindings interfere with visual working memory.

Authors:  Peter Shepherdson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.