Literature DB >> 21643837

What's wrong with the tap? Examining perceptions of tap water and bottled water at Purdue University.

Amber Saylor1, Linda Stalker Prokopy, Shannon Amberg.   

Abstract

The environmental impacts of bottled water prompted us to explore drinking water choices at Purdue University, located in West Lafayette, IN. A random sample of 2,045 Purdue University students, staff, and faculty was invited to participate in an online survey. The survey assessed current behaviors as well as perceived barriers and benefits to drinking tap water versus bottled water. 677 surveys were completed for a response rate of 33.1%. We then conducted qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of university undergraduates (n = 21) to obtain contextual insights into the survey results and the beliefs of individuals with a variety of drinking water preferences. This study revealed that women drink disproportionately more bottled water then men while undergraduate students drink more than graduate students, staff and faculty. The study also uncovered a widespread belief that recycling eliminates the environmental impacts of bottled water. Important barriers to drinking tap water at Purdue include: perceived risks from tap water and the perceived safety of bottled water, preferring the taste of bottled water, and the convenience of drinking bottled water. The qualitative interviews revealed that drinking water choices can be influenced by several factors-especially whether individuals trust tap water to be clean-but involve varying levels of complexity. The implications of these results for social marketing strategies to promote tap water are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643837     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9692-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  3 in total

1.  Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach.

Authors:  M de Franca Doria; N Pidgeon; P Hunter
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 2.  Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers' preferences.

Authors:  Miguel F Doria
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.

Authors:  J Flynn; P Slovic; C K Mertz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.000

  3 in total
  18 in total

1.  Social Perception of Public Water Supply Network and Groundwater Quality in an Urban Setting Facing Saltwater Intrusion and Water Shortages.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alameddine; Gheeda Jawhari; Mutasem El-Fadel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The relationship of perceptions of tap water safety with intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and plain water among US adults.

Authors:  Stephen J Onufrak; Sohyun Park; Joseph R Sharkey; Bettylou Sherry
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Perceptions of tap water and school water fountains and association with intake of plain water and sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Stephen J Onufrak; Sohyun Park; Joseph R Sharkey; Caitlin Merlo; Wesley R Dean; Bettylou Sherry
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  Drinking water quality in a Mexico city university community: perception and preferences.

Authors:  Ana C Espinosa-García; Carlos Díaz-Ávalos; Fernando J González-Villarreal; Rafael Val-Segura; Velvet Malvaez-Orozco; Marisa Mazari-Hiriart
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Estimation of hazardous materials in water and their toxicity levels in Mahayel Aseer, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Authors:  M M El-Toony; Gh Eid; H Algarni
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Reconnaissance of Mixed Organic and Inorganic Chemicals in Private and Public Supply Tapwaters at Selected Residential and Workplace Sites in the United States.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Dana W Kolpin; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Juliane B Brown; Mary C Cardon; Kurt D Carpenter; Steven R Corsi; Laura A DeCicco; Julie E Dietze; Nicola Evans; Edward T Furlong; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Dale W Griffin; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Kathryn M Kuivila; Jason R Masoner; Carrie A McDonough; Michael T Meyer; James L Orlando; Mark J Strynar; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Middle school student attitudes about school drinking fountains and water intake.

Authors:  Anisha I Patel; Laura M Bogart; David J Klein; Kimberly E Uyeda; Jennifer Hawes-Dawson; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  Perceptions of Water-related Environmental Concerns in Northwest Ohio One Year after a Lake Erie Harmful Algal Bloom.

Authors:  April Ames; Victoria Steiner; Erin Liebold; Sheryl A Milz; Samantha Eitniear
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Change of water consumption and its potential influential factors in Shanghai: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hanyi Chen; Yaying Zhang; Linlin Ma; Fangmin Liu; Weiwei Zheng; Qinfeng Shen; Hongmei Zhang; Xiao Wei; Dajun Tian; Gengsheng He; Weidong Qu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Denis R LeBlanc; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Mary C Cardon; Jimmy M Clark; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.