| Literature DB >> 30460851 |
Paul M Bradley1, Dana W Kolpin2, Kristin M Romanok3, Kelly L Smalling3, Michael J Focazio4, Juliane B Brown5, Mary C Cardon6, Kurt D Carpenter7, Steven R Corsi8, Laura A DeCicco8, Julie E Dietze9, Nicola Evans6, Edward T Furlong10, Carrie E Givens11, James L Gray10, Dale W Griffin12, Christopher P Higgins5, Michelle L Hladik13, Luke R Iwanowicz14, Celeste A Journey1, Kathryn M Kuivila7, Jason R Masoner15, Carrie A McDonough5, Michael T Meyer9, James L Orlando13, Mark J Strynar6, Christopher P Weis16, Vickie S Wilson6.
Abstract
Safe drinking water at the point-of-use (tapwater, TW) is a United States public health priority. Multiple lines of evidence were used to evaluate potential human health concerns of 482 organics and 19 inorganics in TW from 13 (7 public supply, 6 private well self-supply) home and 12 (public supply) workplace locations in 11 states. Only uranium (61.9 μg L-1, private well) exceeded a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation maximum contaminant level (MCL: 30 μg L-1). Lead was detected in 23 samples (MCL goal: zero). Seventy-five organics were detected at least once, with median detections of 5 and 17 compounds in self-supply and public supply samples, respectively (corresponding maxima: 12 and 29). Disinfection byproducts predominated in public supply samples, comprising 21% of all detected and 6 of the 10 most frequently detected. Chemicals designed to be bioactive (26 pesticides, 10 pharmaceuticals) comprised 48% of detected organics. Site-specific cumulative exposure-activity ratios (∑EAR) were calculated for the 36 detected organics with ToxCast data. Because these detections are fractional indicators of a largely uncharacterized contaminant space, ∑EAR in excess of 0.001 and 0.01 in 74 and 26% of public supply samples, respectively, provide an argument for prioritized assessment of cumulative effects to vulnerable populations from trace-level TW exposures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30460851 PMCID: PMC6742431 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028