Literature DB >> 21643786

Stroke volume variation obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac™ system during bleeding and fluid overload in dogs.

Hiroyuki Taguchi1, Keisuke Ichinose, Hironari Tanimoto, Michiko Sugita, Masafumi Tashiro, Tatsuo Yamamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stroke volume variation (SVV) is a parameter for estimating fluid responsiveness. Recently, the Vigileo™ and the Flo-Trac™ sensor (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) were made available for clinical use to estimate SVV. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the circulating blood volume and SVV, measured by the Vigileo-FloTrac™ system (SVV-FloTrac) or by central venous pressure (CVP), during a dynamic change in circulating blood transfusion volume, using a continuous constant bleeding and fluid-overload model in dogs.
METHODS: Ten anesthetized and mechanically ventilated beagles were used. SVV-FloTrac and CVP were measured during a bleeding period (2 ml/kg/min, 15 min), a stabilization period (15 min), a blood transfusion period (2 ml/kg/min, 15 min), and a 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution overload period (2 ml/kg/min, 15 min).
RESULTS: SVV-FloTrac changed significantly when more than 8 ml/kg blood was withdrawn or when more than 8 ml/kg blood was transfused. The change in SVV-FloTrac directly reflected the circulating blood volume change during continuous bleeding and blood transfusion. CVP decreased significantly when more than 4 ml/kg blood was withdrawn or when more than 10 ml/kg was infused, and this indicated that the CVP change did not directly reflect the level of the circulating blood volume change. During the stable circulating blood volume period after blood withdrawal, SVV-FloTrac changed significantly but CVP remained constant. During the fluid overload period, CVP, but not SVV-FloTrac, changed significantly.
CONCLUSION: SVV-FloTrac is a sensitive indicator of the dynamic circulating blood volume change during both bleeding and transfusion, but not during either the stable circulating blood volume period after blood withdrawal or the fluid-overload period, in mechanically ventilated dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643786     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1175-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  12 in total

Review 1.  Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Jacques-A Romand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs.

Authors:  H Berkenstadt; Z Friedman; S Preisman; I Keidan; D Livingstone; A Perel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults.

Authors:  Michael P W Grocott; Michael G Mythen; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Henri Musard; Olivier Desebbe; Cécile Boucau; Rémi Simon; Roland Hénaine; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  M Biais; K Nouette-Gaulain; V Cottenceau; P Revel; F Sztark
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Ramon Anel; Eugene Bunnell; Kalim Habet; Sergio Zanotti; Stephanie Marshall; Alex Neumann; Amjad Ali; Mary Cheang; Clifford Kavinsky; Joseph E Parrillo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  MAC for halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane in the New Zealand white rabbit: and a test for the validity of MAC determinations.

Authors:  J C Drummond
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output using a novel measurement and analysis method.

Authors:  Benjamin Pratt; Luchy Roteliuk; Feras Hatib; John Frazier; Roy D Wallen
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

10.  Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system.

Authors:  Christoph K Hofer; Alban Senn; Luc Weibel; Andreas Zollinger
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  The comparison between stroke volume variation and filling pressure as an estimate of right ventricular preload in patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Authors:  Daisuke Toyoda; Mitsue Fukuda; Ririko Iwasaki; Takashi Terada; Nobukazu Sato; Ryoichi Ochiai; Yoshifumi Kotake
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  The impact of inspiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and the evaluation of indexing stroke volume variation to inspiratory pressure under various preload conditions in experimental animals.

Authors:  Yu Kawazoe; Tsuyoshi Nakashima; Toshie Iseri; Chiaki Yonetani; Kentaro Ueda; Yuka Fujimoto; Seiya Kato
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.