Literature DB >> 19151280

The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Maxime Cannesson1, Henri Musard, Olivier Desebbe, Cécile Boucau, Rémi Simon, Roland Hénaine, Jean-Jacques Lehot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure (DeltaPP) are accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of our study was to assess the ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of stroke volume variation (SVV) to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
METHODS: We studied 25 patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting. SVV was continuously displayed by the Vigileo/FloTrac system. All patients were under general anesthesia, mechanical ventilation and were also monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter. SVV and DeltaPP were recorded simultaneously before and after an intravascular volume expansion (VE) (500 mL hetastarch). Responders to VE were defined as patients whose cardiac index obtained using thermodilution increased by more than 15% after VE.
RESULTS: Agreement between DeltaPP and SVV over the 50 pairs of collected data was -1.3% +/- 2.8% (mean bias +/- sd). Seventeen patients were responders to VE. A threshold DeltaPP value of 10% allowed discrimination of responders to VE with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 87%. A threshold SVV value of 10% allowed discrimination of responders to VE with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 88%.
CONCLUSION: SVV predicts fluid responsiveness with an acceptable sensitivity and specificity and is also a potential surrogate for continuous monitoring of DeltaPP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19151280     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318192a36b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  61 in total

Review 1.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Yong Wang; Yanfei Sun; Gang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Prediction of hypotension in the beach chair position during shoulder arthroscopy using pre-operative hemodynamic variables.

Authors:  Youn Yi Jo; Wol Seon Jung; Hong Soon Kim; Young Jin Chang; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Stroke volume variation obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac™ system during bleeding and fluid overload in dogs.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Taguchi; Keisuke Ichinose; Hironari Tanimoto; Michiko Sugita; Masafumi Tashiro; Tatsuo Yamamoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Impact of skin incision on the pleth variability index.

Authors:  Masaharu Takeyama; Akira Matsunaga; Yasuyuki Kakihana; Mina Masuda; Tamotsu Kuniyoshi; Yuichi Kanmura
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael J Lanspa; Colin K Grissom; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jason P Jones; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Pleth variability index-directed fluid management in abdominal surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Yinan Yu; Jing Dong; Zifeng Xu; Hao Shen; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Vigilance of hemodynamic changes immediately after transferring patients is crucial.

Authors:  Zen'ichiro Wajima; Toshiya Shiga; Kazuyuki Imanaga; Tetsuo Inoue
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 9.  Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G Eskesen; M Wetterslev; A Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Anselmo Gil Cano; Juan Carlos Díaz Monrové
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.