Literature DB >> 24962946

The comparison between stroke volume variation and filling pressure as an estimate of right ventricular preload in patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Daisuke Toyoda1, Mitsue Fukuda, Ririko Iwasaki, Takashi Terada, Nobukazu Sato, Ryoichi Ochiai, Yoshifumi Kotake.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective, observational study was to respiratory variation of stroke volume (stroke volume variation, SVV) against central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP) as an estimate of right and left ventricular preload.
METHODS: With IRB approval and informed consent, 31 patients undergoing living related renal transplantation were analyzed. Under general anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation, stroke volume index and SVV were continuously monitored with FloTrac/Vigileo monitor. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) as well as CVP and PADP were continuously monitored with volumetric pulmonary artery catheter. Data of every 30 min interval were used for analysis. The relationship between RVEDVI and CVP, PADP, SVV was analyzed with non-linear regression and the goodness-of-fit was assessed with coefficient of determination (R(2)) of each regression curve. The ability of CVP, PADP and SVV to correctly differentiate RVEDVI <100, <120 or >138 ml/m(2), which were used to guide fluid administration, was also assessed with ROC analysis.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight data sets were obtained and analyzed. The goodness of fit between RVEDVI and SVV (R(2)) = 0.48) was better than that between RVEDVI and CVP or PADP (R(2)) = 0.19 and 0.33, respectively). The area under the ROC curve of SVV was significantly high compared to CVP or PADP.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the theoretical framework of right ventricular preload and ventricular filling pressure and respiratory variation of stroke volume. The result also suggests that SVV can correctly predict preload status compared to pressure-based indices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962946     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1870-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  33 in total

1.  Continuous assessment of right ventricular ejection fraction: new pulmonary artery catheter versus transoesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  W Zink; J Nöll; H Rauch; H Bauer; R Desimone; E Martin; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Intraoperative assessment of right ventricular volume and function.

Authors:  Raffaele De Simone; Ivo Wolf; Sibylle Mottl-Link; Bernd W Böttiger; Helmuth Rauch; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Siegfried Hagl
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Use of tissue Doppler to assess right ventricle function in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Huseyin Arinc; Huseyin Gunduz; Ali Tamer; Hakan Ozhan; Ramazan Akdemir; Hayrettin Saglam; Abdurrahman Oguzhan; Cihangir Uyan
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 4.  Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Henri Musard; Olivier Desebbe; Cécile Boucau; Rémi Simon; Roland Hénaine; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Stop filling patients against central venous pressure, please!

Authors:  Lars Marius Ytrebø
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  M Biais; K Nouette-Gaulain; V Cottenceau; P Revel; F Sztark
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 9.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Ramon Anel; Eugene Bunnell; Kalim Habet; Sergio Zanotti; Stephanie Marshall; Alex Neumann; Amjad Ali; Mary Cheang; Clifford Kavinsky; Joseph E Parrillo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stroke volume variation for predicting responsiveness to fluid therapy in patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Huan; Jin Dai; Shilian Song; Guining Zhu; Yihao Ji; Guoping Yin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: a black box.

Authors:  Maria Helena Calixto Fernandes; Thomas Schricker; Sheldon Magder; Roupen Hatzakorzian
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Renal failure in critically ill patients, beware of applying (central venous) pressure on the kidney.

Authors:  Xiukai Chen; Xiaoting Wang; Patrick M Honore; Herbert D Spapen; Dawei Liu
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  Impact of goal-directed hemodynamic management on the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qiong-Fang Wu; Hao Kong; Zhen-Zhen Xu; Huai-Jin Li; Dong-Liang Mu; Dong-Xin Wang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  [Volemia and kidney transplantation].

Authors:  Roberta Figueiredo Vieira; Maria José Carvalho Carmona
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020 May - Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.