Literature DB >> 12536268

Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care.

Karim Bendjelid1, Jacques-A Romand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In mechanically ventilated patients the indices which assess preload are used with increasing frequency to predict the hemodynamic response to volume expansion. We discuss the clinical utility and accuracy of some indices which were tested as bedside indicators of preload reserve and fluid responsiveness in hypotensive patients under positive pressure ventilation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Although preload assessment can be obtained with fair accuracy, the clinical utility of volume responsiveness-guided fluid therapy still needs to be demonstrated. Indeed, it is still not clear whether any form of monitoring-guided fluid therapy improves survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12536268     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1615-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  96 in total

1.  Effects of increasing airway pressure and PEEP on the assessment of cardiac preload.

Authors:  L N Diebel; T Myers; S Dulchavsky
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-04

2.  Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge.

Authors:  C Reuse; J L Vincent; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive techniques.

Authors:  N Buchbinder; W Ganz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Effect of opening the pericardium on right ventricular hemodynamics during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M Mathru; B Kleinman; D J Dries; T Rao; D Calandra
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations.

Authors:  D A Reuter; T W Felbinger; E Kilger; C Schmidt; P Lamm; A E Goetz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Hemodynamic response to fluid challenge: a means of assessing volume status in the critically ill.

Authors:  H M Horst; F N Obeid
Journal:  Henry Ford Hosp Med J       Date:  1986

7.  Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle.

Authors:  H Suga; K Sagawa
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Cardiovascular effects of ventilatory support and withdrawal.

Authors:  M R Pinsky
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; L D Nelson; M C Chang; K Safcsak
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Current practice regarding invasive monitoring in intensive care units in Finland. A nationwide study of the uses of arterial, pulmonary artery and central venous catheters and their effect on outcome. The Finnish Intensive Care Study Group.

Authors:  E Saarela; A Kari; P Nikki; V Rauhala; E Iisalo; L Kaukinen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  82 in total

1.  Assessing cardiac preload or fluid responsiveness? It depends on the question we want to answer.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Evaluation of fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients: back to venous return.

Authors:  Philippe Vignon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign's Revised Sepsis Bundles.

Authors:  Amisha V Barochia; Xizhong Cui; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Assessing fluid responsiveness with esophageal Doppler dynamic indices: concepts and methods.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  It's time to measure intra-abdominal pressure to optimize hemodynamics!

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Enrico Calzia; Pierre Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  On-line measurement of systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation on a multiparametric monitor.

Authors:  Michele Umbrello; Paolo Formenti; Andrea Galimberti; Moreno Curti; Matteo Zaniboni; Gaetano Iapichino
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery After Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Isabella Favia; Stefano Romagnoli; Luca Di Chiara; Zaccaria Ricci
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Stroke volume variation obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac™ system during bleeding and fluid overload in dogs.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Taguchi; Keisuke Ichinose; Hironari Tanimoto; Michiko Sugita; Masafumi Tashiro; Tatsuo Yamamoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael J Lanspa; Colin K Grissom; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jason P Jones; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.