Nicholas A McGrath1, Ronald T Raines. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Abstract
A critical source of insight into biological function is derived from the chemist's ability to create new covalent bonds between molecules, whether they are endogenous or exogenous to a biological system. A daunting impediment to selective bond formation, however, is the myriad of reactive functionalities present in biological milieu. The high reactivity of the most abundant molecule in biology, water, makes the challenges all the more difficult. We have met these challenges by exploiting the reactivity of sulfur and selenium in acyl transfer reactions. The reactivity of both sulfur and selenium is high compared with that of their chalcogen congener, oxygen. In this Account, we highlight recent developments in this arena, emphasizing contributions from our laboratory. One focus of our research is furthering the chemistry of native chemical ligation (NCL) and expressed protein ligation (EPL), two related processes that enable the synthesis and semisynthesis of proteins. These techniques exploit the lower pK(a) of thiols and selenols relative to alcohols. Although a deprotonated hydroxyl group in the side chain of a serine residue is exceedingly rare in a biological context, the pK(a) values of the thiol in cysteine (8.5) and of the selenol in selenocysteine (5.7) often render these side chains anionic under physiological conditions. NCL and EPL take advantage of the high nucleophilicity of the thiolate as well as its utility as a leaving group, and we have expanded the scope of these methods to include selenocysteine. Although the genetic code limits the components of natural proteins to 20 or so α-amino acids, NCL and EPL enable the semisynthetic incorporation of a limitless variety of nonnatural modules into proteins. These modules are enabling chemical biologists to interrogate protein structure and function with unprecedented precision. We are also pursuing the further development of the traceless Staudinger ligation, through which a phosphinothioester and azide form an amide. We first reported this chemical ligation method, which leaves no residual atoms in the product, in 2000. Our progress in effecting the reaction in water, without an organic cosolvent, was an important step in the expansion of its utility. Moreover, we have developed the traceless Staudinger reaction as a means for immobilizing proteins on a solid support, providing a general method of fabricating microarrays that display proteins in a uniform orientation. Along with NCL and EPL, the traceless Staudinger ligation has made proteins more readily accessible targets for chemical synthesis and semisynthesis. The underlying acyl transfer reactions with sulfur and selenium provide an efficient means to synthesize, remodel, and immobilize proteins, and they have enabled us to interrogate biological systems.
A critical source of insight into biological function is derived from the chemist's ability to create new covalent bonds between molecules, whether they are endogenous or exogenous to a biological system. A daunting impediment to selective bond formation, however, is the myriad of reactive functionalities present in biological milieu. The high reactivity of the most abundant molecule in biology, water, makes the challenges all the more difficult. We have met these challenges by exploiting the reactivity of sulfur and selenium in acyl transfer reactions. The reactivity of both sulfur and selenium is high compared with that of their chalcogen congener, oxygen. In this Account, we highlight recent developments in this arena, emphasizing contributions from our laboratory. One focus of our research is furthering the chemistry of native chemical ligation (NCL) and expressed protein ligation (EPL), two related processes that enable the synthesis and semisynthesis of proteins. These techniques exploit the lower pK(a) of thiols and selenols relative to alcohols. Although a deprotonated hydroxyl group in the side chain of a serine residue is exceedingly rare in a biological context, the pK(a) values of the thiol in cysteine (8.5) and of the selenol in selenocysteine (5.7) often render these side chains anionic under physiological conditions. NCL and EPL take advantage of the high nucleophilicity of the thiolate as well as its utility as a leaving group, and we have expanded the scope of these methods to include selenocysteine. Although the genetic code limits the components of natural proteins to 20 or so α-amino acids, NCL and EPL enable the semisynthetic incorporation of a limitless variety of nonnatural modules into proteins. These modules are enabling chemical biologists to interrogate protein structure and function with unprecedented precision. We are also pursuing the further development of the traceless Staudinger ligation, through which a phosphinothioester and azide form an amide. We first reported this chemical ligation method, which leaves no residual atoms in the product, in 2000. Our progress in effecting the reaction in water, without an organic cosolvent, was an important step in the expansion of its utility. Moreover, we have developed the traceless Staudinger reaction as a means for immobilizing proteins on a solid support, providing a general method of fabricating microarrays that display proteins in a uniform orientation. Along with NCL and EPL, the traceless Staudinger ligation has made proteins more readily accessible targets for chemical synthesis and semisynthesis. The underlying acyl transfer reactions with sulfur and selenium provide an efficient means to synthesize, remodel, and immobilize proteins, and they have enabled us to interrogate biological systems.
As articulated by Trost in 1973,[1−3] “chemoselectivity”
refers to the preferential reaction of a chemical reagent with one
of two or more different functional groups.[3] In modern chemical biology, the desire to form covalent bonds with
molecules endogenous or exogenous to a biological system has made
the search for chemoselective reactions into a sine qua non. The challenge of developing such chemoselective reactions is amplified
by the high reactivity of the most abundant molecule in biological
systems, water.Nature provides some inspiration. For example, the thiol group
of coenzyme A[4] is a means to convey acetyl
groups, via a thioester, into the citric acid cycle. Similar thiols,[5] as well as selenols,[6,7] play important
roles in numerous biological pathways and in the biosynthesis of polyketides
and the nonribosomal biosynthesis of peptides.[8] This utility is due to the distinct properties of sulfur and selenium
compared with their chalcogen congener, oxygen.[9] A key difference is the acidity of an alcohol, thiol, and
selenol. Although a deprotonated hydroxyl group in the side chain
of a serine residue is exceedingly rare in a biological context, the
pKa[10] of the
thiol in cysteine (8.5) and of the selenol in selenocysteine (5.7)
decree that both of these side chains are often anionic under physiological
conditions. These low pKa values enhance
the reactivity of cysteine and selenocysteine at physiological pH,
as well as the reactivity of their thio- and selenoester counterparts.
For example, a thioester is 102-fold more reactive toward
amine and thiolate nucleophiles than is an isologous oxoester but
has a comparable resistance to hydrolysis,[11−13] and thermodynamic
stability increases in the order thioester < oxoester < amide.[14,15] This versatile and chemoselective reactivity, coupled with the low
abundance[16] of cysteine and selenocysteine
relative to other proteinogenic amino acids, enables their utility
in the synthesis and semisynthesis of proteins. Here, we review work
from our laboratory that has exploited acyl transfer reactions with
the chalcogens sulfur and selenium.
Thioesters in Native Chemical Ligation
A popular method in chemical biology that avails the unique reactivity
of the chalcogens is native chemical ligation (NCL). Precedented by
reactivity discovered by Wieland in 1953[17] and developed by Kent and co-workers starting in 1994,[18,19] NCL is a two-step process that uses the high nucleophilicity of
the thiolate anion, as well as its ability to act as a leaving group,[20] to join two peptides. Specifically, the thiolate
of an N-terminal cysteine residue of one peptide reacts with a C-terminal
thioester installed in a second peptide, forming an amide bond after
rapid S- to N-acyl group transfer
(Figure 1). An extension of NCL, expressed
protein ligation (EPL),[21−23] employs an engineered intein
to access a polypeptide containing a C-terminal thioester, which can
react subsequently with the thiolate of an N-terminal cysteine residue.
Figure 1
Mechanism
of NCL.[18,19]
Mechanism
of NCL.[18,19]We utilized EPL to construct the paradigmatic enzyme bovinepancreatic
ribonuclease (RNase A[24,25]).[26] RNase A consists of 124 residues, including eight cysteines that
form four disulfide bonds in the native enzyme.[24] We achieved its semisynthesis with cysteine 95 as the point
of disconnection. After expression of the fusion protein and thiol-induced
cleavage, the RNase A(1–94) fragment with a C-terminal thioester
was reacted with the N-terminal cysteine of a peptide corresponding
to residues 95–124, thereby reconstituting wild-type RNase
A. Altogether, the semisynthetic route (Figure 2) required four distinct acyl transfer reactions involving sulfur.
Figure 2
Route
for the semisynthesis of wild-type RNase A by EPL.[26,27]
Route
for the semisynthesis of wild-type RNase A by EPL.[26,27]The genetic code limits the components of natural proteins, like
RNase A, to 20 or so α-amino acids. In contrast, EPL enables
the semisynthetic incorporation of a limitless variety of nonnatural
modules into proteins. These modules are enabling chemical biologists
to interrogate protein structure and function with unprecedented precision.Our work with EPL has focused on the reverse turn.[28,29] Compared with α-helices and β-sheets, which are buttressed
by numerous hydrogen bonds, turns are unconstrained and unstable.
Moreover, turns are often a preferred site for degradation by proteolytic
enzymes.[30,31] Hence, it is important to identify reverse
turn mimics that can endow stability and withstand proteolysis.[32]Toward this end, we replaced two residues that form a reverse turn
in RNase A (asparagine 113–proline 114) with a variety of synthetic
mimics (Figure 3). The first was a module consisting
of two cyclic β-amino acid residues, R-nipecotic
acid–S-nipecotic acid (R-Nip–S-Nip).[27] This dipeptide unit
was known to form an internal hydrogen bond[33] that promotes β-hairpin formation.[34,35] We found the catalytic activity of the ensuing variant of RNase
A to be indistinguishable from that of the wild-type enzyme. Moreover,
the variant had greater thermostability (ΔTm = 1.2 ± 0.3 °C). Installing a diastereomeric
analog that cannot form a turn (R-Nip–R-Nip) caused the enzyme to lose nearly all catalytic activity.
Figure 3
Reverse-turn
mimics incorporated into a protein (RNase A) by EPL.[27,36,37]
Reverse-turn
mimics incorporated into a protein (RNase A) by EPL.[27,36,37]Likewise, we used EPL to replace proline 114 in RNase A with the
non-natural amino acid 5,5-dimethyl-l-proline (dmP).[36] The dmP module is unusual in being an α-amino
acid that forms almost exclusively cis (that is, E) peptide bonds,[38−41] which are a signature of type VI reverse turns.[42] The catalytic activity of this analog was found to be virtually
identical to that of the wild-type enzyme, and it again was endowed
with increased thermostability (ΔTm = 2.8 ± 0.3 °C), along with faster folding. To probe further
the effect of cis peptide bonds on the rate of peptide folding, EPL
was used to replace asparagine 113–proline 114 with a 1,5-triazole
surrogate made by a Ru(II)-catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
reaction.[37] The 1,5-triazole, which mimics
a cis peptide bond, enables the enzyme to retain high catalytic activity
and thermostability. In contrast, the regioisomeric 1,4-triazole made
by Cu(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition of the same components, has compromised
thermostability.Proteins contain several nucleophiles but no electrophiles (other
than disulfide bonds). We used intein-mediated protein splicing to
develop a general strategy for intercepting a transiently formed electrophile
as a means of appending a useful functional group to the C-terminus
of a protein (Figure 4). Upon examining the
capture of a model thioester by various nitrogen-based nucleophiles,
we found that hydrazines give the highest rates for S- to N-acyl transfer.[43] The intein-thioester of RNase A, when treated with hydrazino azide 1, led to RNase A labeled at the C-terminus with a versatile
azido group.
Figure 4
General
route for adding a functional group (here, an azido group) to the
C-terminus of a protein.[43]
General
route for adding a functional group (here, an azido group) to the
C-terminus of a protein.[43]
Selenoesters in Native Chemical Ligation
l-Selenocysteine (Sec or U), often referred to as the
“21st amino acid”,[44−47] is not produced by posttranslational modification
but rather shares many features with the 20 common amino acids. Selenocysteine
has its own codon and its own unique tRNA molecule, and is incorporated
into proteins by ribosomes.[48] The incorporation
of selenocysteine rather than cysteine enables proteins to avoid irreversible
oxidation, because a seleninic acid (unlike a sulfinic acid) can be
reduced readily.[49] Many natural proteins
that contain selenocysteine are known,[50] yet direct introduction of selenium into an existing protein remains
a challenge. We reasoned that selenocysteine, like cysteine, could
effect both NCL and EPL and thereby provide a means to incorporate
selenocysteine into proteins. A selenolate (RSe–) is more nucleophilic than its analogous thiolate (RS–).[51−54] Moreover, the pKa of a selenol (RSeH)
is lower than that of its analogous thiol (RSH). These properties
suggested to us that native chemical ligation with selenocysteine
should be more rapid than that with cysteine, especially at low pH.
We tested this hypothesis by comparing the rates at which cysteine
and selenocysteine react with a model thioester. We found that selenocysteine
reacts 103-fold faster than does cysteine at pH 5.0,[55] providing high chemoselectivity (Figure 5).
Figure 5
pH–rate
profile of cysteine and selenocysteine in native chemical ligation.[55]
pH–rate
profile of cysteine and selenocysteine in native chemical ligation.[55]Next, we explored the utility of selenium in EPL. We made residues
1–109 of RNase A bearing a C-terminal thioester using rDNA
technology and solid-phase peptide synthesis to access residues 110–124
with either cysteine or selenocysteine[56] as residue 110. After ligation, the two synthetic proteins, RNase
A and C110U RNase A, had indistinguishable catalytic activity. A disulfide
bond between cysteine 58 and cysteine 110 makes a significant contribution
to catalytic activity.[57] Accordingly, we
concluded that the C110U variant formed a selenosulfide bond. Because
the reduction potential of selenosulfide and diselenide bonds is less
than that of the corresponding disulfide,[58] this strategy could be used to endow a protein with high conformational
stability in a reducing environment, such as the cytosol. Finally,
we exploited the mechanism of intein-mediated protein splicing to
access a protein with a pendant C-terminal selenocysteine residue
that is poised for a chemoselective reaction, even in the presence
of cysteine residues.[59]
Phosphinothioesters in the Traceless Staudinger Ligation: Protein
Assembly
NCL and EPL enable the synthesis and semisynthesis of proteins.
These methods are limited, however, by the requirement for a cysteine
residue at the ligation juncture. Several methods (including an inspirational
modification of the venerable Staudinger reaction by Bertozzi[60]) overcome this limitation but are limited otherwise
in adding exogenous atoms to the product. Another approach is to desulfurize
the ligation product, thereby accomplishing, in effect, an alanine
ligation.[61−63] For this method to be effective, all other sulfur
moieties must be resistant to the desulfurization conditions.[64] This approach has been extended to accomplish
ligations at valine,[65,66] lysine,[67] threonine,[68] and leucine residues.[69,70]In 2000, we reported on a chemical ligation method that leaves
no residual atoms in the product and that avails the chemoselectivity
of sulfur in acyl transfer reactions. First, the nucleophilicity of
sulfur is used to create a phosphinothioester at the C-terminus of
a peptide by S- to S-acyl transfer
from an extant thioester[71,72] to a phosphinothiol
(Figure 6). Treating the incipient C-terminal
phosphino group with a second peptide containing an N-terminal azido
group[73] initiates the Staudinger reaction,
generating an iminophosphorane intermediate. Intramolecular S- to N-acyl transfer from the sulfur of
the thioester to the nitrogen of the iminophosphorane generates an
amidophosphonium salt. Hydrolysis of the P–N bond provides
a nascent peptide bond in a traceless manner. By generating N2 and a phosphine oxide, the traceless Staudinger ligation
adds the thermodynamic driving force of the Staudinger reaction to
that of native chemical ligation.[74]
Figure 6
Mechanism
of the traceless Staudinger ligation, here mediated by phosphinothiol 4.[75,76]
Mechanism
of the traceless Staudinger ligation, here mediated by phosphinothiol 4.[75,76]The attributes of the phosphinothiol reagent are the key to achieving
a Staudinger ligation in high yield. During the course of our work,
we have synthesized and evaluated numerous P,P-diaryl phosphinothiols that effect the transformation
(Figure 7). (P,P,P-Trialkylphosphinothiols are also effective,[77] but are highly prone toward oxidation.) The
first reagent used to perform a traceless Staudinger ligation was o-phosphinobenzenethiol (2).[75] Although capable of carrying out the desired coupling between
a phenylalanyl thioester and glycyl azide, it gave only a 35% yield
of the desired peptide product (Figure 8).
We learned that this low yield was due to competition with the reduction
to the amine. The Staudinger ligation with phosphinothiol 2 (and 3(78,79)) occurs through a transition
state with a six-membered ring. We reasoned that by accessing instead
a transition state with a five-membered ring,[80] we could favor the ligation over the reduction pathway. To assess
our reasoning, we synthesized diphenylphosphinomethanethiol (4) and found that it facilitated the same coupling in a much
more impressive 85% yield over two steps (Figure 8).[76]
Figure 7
Phosphinothiol
reagents that effect the traceless Staudinger ligation.[75,76,79,81−83]
Figure 8
Traceless
Staudinger ligations mediated by phosphinothiols 2 and 4.[75,76]
Phosphinothiol
reagents that effect the traceless Staudinger ligation.[75,76,79,81−83]Traceless
Staudinger ligations mediated by phosphinothiols 2 and 4.[75,76]To expand further the scope of this transformation, it was necessary
to determine the reactivity of chiral azides. All natural α-amino
acids except glycine have a stereogenic center at their α-carbon.
To be useful as a means to couple peptides, a ligation reaction must
proceed without any measurable epimerization. To address this concern,
the azido benzamides of both enantiomers of phenylalanine, serine,
and aspartic acid were synthesized and subjected to Staudinger ligation
mediated by phosphinothiol 4.[84] Phenylalanine, serine, and aspartic acid were chosen as representatives
of three distinct side chains with moderate to high propensity for
epimerization during standard peptide couplings.[85] In all cases, the ligation proceeded in excellent yield
(>90%) to give the expected amides without any loss of enantiomeric
excess as determined by chiral HPLC (Figure 9).
Figure 9
Traceless
Staudinger ligation with non-glycyl azides mediated by phosphinothiol 4.[84] The products suffered no detectable
epimerization.
Traceless
Staudinger ligation with non-glycyl azides mediated by phosphinothiol 4.[84] The products suffered no detectable
epimerization.The Staudinger ligation has proven to be a versatile alternative
to NCL, EPL, and resin-based methods for the synthesis of peptides.[86] To expand this versatility to protein production,
we tested the ability of the Staudinger ligation to work in concert
with NCL.[87] Specifically, we sought to
assemble RNase A from three peptide fragments composed of residues
1–109, 110–111, and 112–124 (Figure 10). The 109–110 peptide bond would be formed
by NCL, and the 111–112 peptide bond by Staudinger ligation.
To accomplish this feat, the 112–124 fragment was synthesized
with an N-terminal azido group and with its C-terminus attached to
PEGA resin. This fragment was treated with the C-terminal phosphinothioester
of the 110–111 fragment[88] and then
cleaved from the resin to give RNase A(110–124) in 61% yield.
This process was also carried out with [13C′,13Cα,15N]proline 114 to give the
analogous labeled peptide. RNase A(1–109) was prepared with
a C-terminal thioester by using an intein and coupled with cysteine
110 of both labeled and unlabeled RNase A(110–124) to give
enzymes with full catalytic activity. One-dimensional HSQC NMR experiments
with the labeled semisynthetic protein confirmed that the 113–114
peptide bond had the expected cis conformation (Figure 3). Along with NCL and EPL, the traceless Staudinger ligation
has made proteins accessible targets for chemical synthesis and semisynthesis.[74]
Figure 10
Semisynthesis
of RNase A by integrating the traceless Staudinger ligation (here,
on a resin) and NCL.[87]
Semisynthesis
of RNase A by integrating the traceless Staudinger ligation (here,
on a resin) and NCL.[87]Simple aryl or alkyl phosphinothiol reagents are highly effective
at mediating the Staudinger ligation when a glycine residue is at
one of the two coupling sites. When neither residue at the coupling
site is glycine, however, the ligation yield drops sharply.[89] To address the inefficiency of hindered (that
is, non-glycyl) coupling reactions, we tuned the electron density
on the phosphorus by adding substituents to the aryl rings of the
phosphinothiol.[81] We found that the electron-donating p-methoxy groups in phosphinothiol 7 enabled
efficient ligation (>80%) of both alanine and phenylalaninethioesters
with an alanine azide (Figure 11).[81] In a related kinetic study with phosphinothiols 4–9, we found that the rate of ligation
of sterically hindered amino acids increases but the yield of product
decreases with electron donation.[82] We
suspect that too much electron density renders the iminophosphoranenitrogen highly susceptible to protonation by water, which leads to
hydrolysis of the P–N bond prior to the desired S- to N-acyl transfer.
Figure 11
Traceless
Staudinger ligation at nonglycine residues mediated by phosphinothiol 7.[81]
Traceless
Staudinger ligation at nonglycine residues mediated by phosphinothiol 7.[81]As with any new chemical transformation, gaining insight into the
kinetics and mechanism of the reaction is vital. Experiments with 18O-labeled water confirmed[79] that
the reaction proceeds by S- to N-acyl transfer of the iminophosphorane intermediate to form an amidophosphonium
salt, which hydrolyzes to give exclusive 18O incorporation
in the phosphine oxide byproduct (Figure 12). In addition, a continuous assay based on 13C NMR spectroscopy
revealed that the rate-determining step in the Staudinger ligation
was the formation of the initial phosphazide intermediate.[90] A second-order rate constant of 7.7 × 10–3 M–1 s–1 was determined
for the reaction, which is consistent with that for other Staudinger
ligations. The NMR experiment showed rapid conversion of starting
materials to products without the accumulation of intermediates. Polar
solvents were shown to increase the rate of the reaction, providing
further support for a charged phosphazide intermediate in the rate-determining
transition state.
Figure 12
Kinetic
and mechanistic insights on the traceless Staudinger ligation mediated
by phosphinothiol 4. The second-order rate constant in
DMF/water (6:1) was k = 7.7 × 10–3 M–1 s–1.[79]
Kinetic
and mechanistic insights on the traceless Staudinger ligation mediated
by phosphinothiol 4. The second-order rate constant in
DMF/water (6:1) was k = 7.7 × 10–3 M–1 s–1.[79]The ability to carry out the Staudinger ligation in water without
an organic cosolvent was an important hurdle in the expansion of its
utility.[91] The key to this endeavor was
the careful design of a new phosphinothiol reagent that retained high
reactivity while attaining water solubility. We synthesized the phosphinothiols 10–14, which all contain a thiomethyl
group and exhibit water solubility. Bis(p-dimethylaminoethylphenyl)phosphinomethanethiol
(11) was shown to mediate the rapid ligation of equimolar
substrates in water. Moreover, this reagent also performed an S- to S-acyl transfer reaction with the
thioester intermediate formed during intein-mediated protein splicing
of RNase A without the need for a catalytic small-molecule thiol.[92,93] In a related study, we investigated the proximity of the amino groups
to the reaction center.[83] With its cationic
dimethylammonium groups close to its phosphorus, phosphinothiol 13 proved to be a superior reagent for mediating a traceless
Staudinger ligation in water, enabling yields of 70% near pH 8.0 (Figure 13).
Figure 13
Traceless
Staudinger ligation in water mediated by phosphinothiol 13.
Traceless
Staudinger ligation in water mediated by phosphinothiol 13.
Phosphinothioesters in the Traceless Staudinger Ligation: Protein
Immobilization
The traceless Staudinger ligation is a versatile new tool for protein
chemistry. The chemoselective reaction takes advantage of the unique
properties of sulfur as both a good nucleophile and, ultimately, a
good leaving group. We reasoned that, in addition to its synthetic
utility, the reaction also provides a means to immobilize proteins
on a solid support.To test the applicability of the Staudinger ligation for protein
immobilization, we chose RNase S as a target.[94] RNase S, the archetypal protein-fragment complementation system,[95] consists of S15 (residues 1–15 of RNase
A) and S-protein (residues 21–124). We synthesized S15 in two
forms, one with the azido group in place of the side-chain amino group
of lysine 1 and another with an azido group attached to the N-terminus
via a PEG linker. We then immobilized phosphinothiol 4 as a thioester on the surface of a glass slide and treated it with
azido-S15 analog 15 or 16, followed by S-protein
(Figure 14). S15 was immobilized on the surface
rapidly (t1/2 < 1 min) in 67% yield,
and the S-protein·S15 complexes formed with immobilized 15 and 16 retained 85% and 92%, respectively,
of the catalytic activity of soluble RNase S.
Figure 14
Traceless
Staudinger ligation to immobilize a peptide and then a bipartite protein
on a glass surface.[94]
Traceless
Staudinger ligation to immobilize a peptide and then a bipartite protein
on a glass surface.[94]Next, we applied the traceless Staudinger ligation to an intact
protein. We did so by displaying a phosphinothiol 4 as
a thioester on a self-assembled monolayer on a gold chip (Figure 15). An azido group was installed at the C-terminus
of RNase A as before by intercepting its intein thioester with hydrazino
azide 1 (Figure 4).[96] Immobilization proceeded rapidly and selectively,
and the immobilized protein retained its catalytic activity and was
able to bind to a natural inhibitor protein. This strategy provides
a general means to fabricate microarrays displaying proteins in a
uniform orientation.
Figure 15
Traceless
Staudinger ligation to immobilize a protein on a gold surface via
its C-terminus. The azido-protein (RNase A) was produced by the route
shown in Figure 4.[96]
Traceless
Staudinger ligation to immobilize a protein on a gold surface via
its C-terminus. The azido-protein (RNase A) was produced by the route
shown in Figure 4.[96]
Coda
In the decade since its introduction, the traceless Staudinger
ligation has provided synthetic chemists and chemical biologists with
a chemoselective means to create an amide bond. By tuning the electronics
and solubility of the phosphinothiols, we have identified optimized
reagents for effecting the traceless Staudinger ligation in different
contexts (Figure 16). Still, an important caveat
exists. The rate constant for the fastest known Staudinger ligation
at room temperature is k = 7.7 × 10–3 M–1 s–1 (Figure 12). In general, a reaction between two equimolar reactants
provides a 50% yield of product at time t = 1/(k[reactant]).[97] With reactant concentrations of 1 μM, this most rapid
Staudinger ligation will require 4.1 years to form 0.5 μM of
an amide product! Accordingly, the Staudinger ligation is useful for
synthetic reactions (Figure 17) but requires
extraordinary detection methods for application in a biological context.
Figure 16
Phosphinothiols
that have been optimized for mediating the traceless Staudinger ligation
in the indicated contexts. The synthesis of phosphinothiols 4, 7, and 13 were reported first
in refs (76, 81, and 83); for
detailed experimental protocols, see ref (93).
Figure 17
Plot
showing the dependence of the yield of a traceless Staudinger ligation
reaction (Figure 12) on the concentration of
equimolar reactants with k = 7.7 × 10–3 M–1 s–1 and t = 1 h. Yield = kt[reactant]/(1 + kt[reactant]).[97]
Phosphinothiols
that have been optimized for mediating the traceless Staudinger ligation
in the indicated contexts. The synthesis of phosphinothiols 4, 7, and 13 were reported first
in refs (76, 81, and 83); for
detailed experimental protocols, see ref (93).Plot
showing the dependence of the yield of a traceless Staudinger ligation
reaction (Figure 12) on the concentration of
equimolar reactants with k = 7.7 × 10–3 M–1 s–1 and t = 1 h. Yield = kt[reactant]/(1 + kt[reactant]).[97]
Conclusion
Designing new chemical reactions that can attain high chemoselectivity
in the presence of a plethora of reactive functionalities found in
native biological settings is and will continue to be an important
goal for chemists and biologists alike. The unique acyl transfer capabilities
of sulfur and selenium make them important tools for chemical biologists
in this ongoing challenge.
Authors: Fiona L Lin; Helen M Hoyt; Herman van Halbeek; Robert G Bergman; Carolyn R Bertozzi Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-03-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Christian M Cole; Roberto J Brea; Young Hun Kim; Michael D Hardy; Jerry Yang; Neal K Devaraj Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 15.336