Literature DB >> 21617389

Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.

Steven L Simon1.   

Abstract

While radiation absorbed dose (Gy) to the skin or other organs is sometimes estimated for patients from diagnostic radiologic examinations or therapeutic procedures, rarely is occupationally-received radiation absorbed dose to individual organs/tissues estimated for medical personnel; e.g., radiologic technologists or radiologists. Generally, for medical personnel, equivalent or effective radiation doses are estimated for compliance purposes. In the very few cases when organ doses to medical personnel are reconstructed, the data is usually for the purpose of epidemiologic studies; e.g., a study of historical doses and risks to a cohort of about 110,000 radiologic technologists presently underway at the U.S. National Cancer Institute. While ICRP and ICRU have published organ-specific external dose conversion coefficients (DCCs) (i.e., absorbed dose to organs and tissues per unit air kerma and dose equivalent per unit air kerma), those factors have been published primarily for mono-energetic photons at selected energies. This presents two related problems for historical dose reconstruction, both of which are addressed here. It is necessary to derive conversion factor values for (1) continuous distributions of energy typical of diagnostic medical x-rays (bremsstrahlung radiation), and (2) energies of particular radioisotopes used in medical procedures, neither of which are presented in published tables. For derivation of DCCs for bremsstrahlung radiation, combinations of x-ray tube potentials and filtrations were derived for different time periods based on a review of relevant literature. Three peak tube potentials (70 kV, 80 kV, and 90 kV) with four different amounts of beam filtration were determined to be applicable for historic dose reconstruction. The probabilities of these machine settings were assigned to each of the four time periods (earlier than 1949, 1949-1954, 1955-1968, and after 1968). Continuous functions were fit to each set of discrete values of the ICRP/ICRU mono-energetic DCCs and the functions integrated over the air-kerma weighted photon fluence of the 12 defined x-ray spectra. The air kerma-weighted DCCs in this work were developed specifically for an irradiation geometry of anterior to posterior (AP) and for the following tissues: thyroid, breast, ovary, lens of eye, lung, colon, testes, heart, skin (anterior side only), red bone marrow (RBM), and brain. In addition, a series of functional relationships to predict DT Ka-1 values for RBM dependent on body mass index [BMI (kg m-2) ≡ weight per height] and average photon energy were derived from a published analysis. Factors to account for attenuation of radiation by protective lead aprons were also developed. Because lead protective aprons often worn by radiology personnel not only reduce the intensity of x-ray exposure but also appreciably harden the transmitted fluence of bremsstrahlung x-rays, DCCs were separately calculated for organs possibly protected by lead aprons by considering three cases: no apron, 0.25 mm Pb apron, and 0.5 mm Pb apron. For estimation of organ doses from conducting procedures with radioisotopes, continuous functions of the reported mono-energetic values were developed, and DCCs were derived by estimation of the function at relevant energies. By considering the temporal changes in primary exposure-related parameters (e.g., energy distribution), the derived DCCs and transmission factors presented here allow for more realistic historical dose reconstructions for medical personnel when monitoring badge readings are the primary data on which estimation of an individual's organ doses are based.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617389      PMCID: PMC3964780          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318204a60a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   2.922


  24 in total

1.  Stray radiation in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory.

Authors:  S Balter
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.

Authors:  Emmanuel G Christodoulou; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Sandra C Larson; Katie L Darner; Jahangir Satti; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetry for epidemiological studies: learning from the past, looking to the future.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Ruth Kleinerman; Elaine Ron
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.

Authors:  Daniel W Schafer; Ethel S Gilbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Scattered radiation from a tissue-equivalent phantom for x rays from 50 to 300 kVp.

Authors:  E D Trout; J P Kelley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  All about FAX: a Female Adult voXel phantom for Monte Carlo calculation in radiation protection dosimetry.

Authors:  R Kramer; H J Khoury; J W Vieira; E C M Loureiro; V J M Lima; F R A Lima; G Hoff
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Attenuation properties of lead composite aprons.

Authors:  P H Murphy; Y Wu; S A Glaze
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy.

Authors:  I G Zubal; C R Harrell; E O Smith; Z Rattner; G Gindi; P B Hoffer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Evaluation of radiation exposures to personnel in fluoroscopic X-ray facilities.

Authors:  E L McGuire; M L Baker; J F Vandergrift
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 10.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Nina Petoussi-Henss; Maria Zanki; Ute Fill; Dieter Regulla
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  16 in total

1.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Cari M Kitahara; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Marie-Odile Bernier; Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; Michele M Doody; David Borrego; Jeremy S Miller; Bruce H Alexander; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Nobuyuki Hamada; Martha S Linet; Craig Meyer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines.

Authors:  André Bouville; Richard E Toohey; John D Boice; Harold L Beck; Larry T Dauer; Keith F Eckerman; Derek Hagemeyer; Richard W Leggett; Michael T Mumma; Bruce Napier; Kathy H Pryor; Marvin Rosenstein; David A Schauer; Sami Sherbini; Daniel O Stram; James L Thompson; John E Till; Craig Yoder; Cary Zeitlin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Photon energy readings in OSL dosimeter filters: an application to retrospective dose estimation for nuclear medicine workers.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; Cari M Kitahara; Christopher Passmore; Steven L Simon; R Craig Yoder
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.394

6.  Occupational radiation exposure and thyroid cancer incidence in a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists, 1983-2013.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Dale L Preston; Gila Neta; Mark P Little; Michele M Doody; Steven L Simon; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Dose coefficients for ICRP reference pediatric phantoms exposed to idealised external gamma fields.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Steven L Simon; Timothy J Jorgensen; David A Schauer; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 1.394

8.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Nuclear medicine practices in the 1950s through the mid-1970s and occupational radiation doses to technologists from diagnostic radioisotope procedures.

Authors:  Vladimir Drozdovitch; Aaron B Brill; Fred A Mettler; William M Beckner; Stanley J Goldsmith; Milton D Gross; Marguerite T Hays; Peter T Kirchner; James K Langan; Richard C Reba; Gary T Smith; André Bouville; Martha S Linet; Dunstana R Melo; Choonsik Lee; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 10.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.