Literature DB >> 8416577

Attenuation properties of lead composite aprons.

P H Murphy1, Y Wu, S A Glaze.   

Abstract

Traditionally, the absorption properties of protective aprons used in diagnostic radiology have been specified in units of lead equivalent thickness. This is appropriate and accurate when lead is the only high-atomic-numbered component in the apron. In an attempt to manufacture light-weight protective apparel, however, some manufacturers have included other elements with k absorption edges in the energy range of interest, to provide equivalent absorption properties with less weight. With these other high-atomic-numbered elements added, the lead equivalence of the apparel becomes a function of the photon energy. This must be recognized and specified by the supplier, because lead apparel is used in environments other than diagnostic radiology, where the shielding benefits may be substantially less than expected when specifications are based on the diagnostic x-ray energy range.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416577     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

Review 1.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.

Authors:  M Finnerty; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Louis K Wagner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgical practice.

Authors:  Ishaq Ojodu; Ayodele Ogunsemoyin; Sascha Hopp; Tim Pohlemann; Oluwole Ige; Oluwaseun Akinola
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-23

5.  Quality Assurance of Personal Radiation Shield for Kilovoltage Photon: A Multicentre Experience.

Authors:  Omemh Bawazeer
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-24

6.  Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.

Authors:  Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.922

7.  Assessment of the Radiation Attenuation Properties of Several Lead Free Composites by Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  M Kazempour; M Saeedimoghadam; F Shekoohi Shooli; N Shokrpour
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2015-06-01

8.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.

Authors:  Hiroshige Mori; Kichiro Koshida; Osamu Ishigamori; Kosuke Matsubara
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-12-13

9.  A novel radiation protection device based on tungsten functional paper for application in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Kohei Shimomura; Yuichi Onishi; Shinichi Nakayama; Takahiro Fujimoto; Kenji Matsumoto; Kohei Hanaoka; Takeshi Kamomae
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of the occupational doses of interventional radiologists.

Authors:  Gerritjan Kuipers; Xandra L Velders; Robbert J de Winter; Jim A Reekers; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.